Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-05-25 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145506
Di Zhang , Shaohua Guo , Changyong Liu , Shen Qu , Hongbin Cao , He Zhao
{"title":"Industrial zero liquid discharge strategy in the water-scarce regions of China triggering the antagonism tradeoff of pollution and carbon emissions","authors":"Di Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaohua Guo ,&nbsp;Changyong Liu ,&nbsp;Shen Qu ,&nbsp;Hongbin Cao ,&nbsp;He Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions, or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods. Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"508 ","pages":"Article 145506"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262500856X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to limited water resources, zero liquid discharge is the environmental impact assessment admittance threshold for new coal chemical projects in China. However, it is unknown whether the application of zero liquid discharge technologies will actually change environmental impacts, carbon emissions, or costs. In this paper, a comprehensive evaluation model was developed to analyze unintended non-synergistic of pollution and carbon emissions and to perform a cost-benefit analysis of mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies. Two zero liquid discharge and two non-zero liquid discharge processes covering mainstream brine treatment technologies of coal chemical industry in China were compared. The results showed that some mainstream zero liquid discharge technologies had unintended consequences in terms of their environmental impact, carbon footprint, and cost. The high-salinity water treatment units using evaporative crystallization are key components during coal-to-olefin water treatment methods. Because energy-intensive equipment is used to evaporate water, the processes utilizing an evaporative crystallization unit incurred nearly two times the cost, with a 24.3 %–117.4 % increase in carbon footprint, compared to those not using the unit. The benefits of salt products such as sodium chloride obtained from the evaporation process are far lower than their costs and they generate salt-containing organic pollution, which increases the environmental risks. Due to carbon neutrality goals, zero liquid discharge technologies must solve the two major problems of waste salt generation and high energy consumption. Up to 196–423 kt of carbon emissions can be eliminated by 2050 by using green energy substitutes, technological innovation, and regent reduction. This provides a direction for the future development of zero liquid discharge technologies for coal chemical industry in water-scarce regions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国缺水地区工业零液体排放策略引发污染与碳排放的对抗权衡
由于水资源有限,中国新建煤化工项目的环境影响评价准入门槛为零排放。然而,零液体排放技术的应用是否会真正改变环境影响、碳排放或成本,目前尚不清楚。本文建立了一个综合评价模型,分析了污染和碳排放的非协同效应,并对主流零液体排放技术进行了成本效益分析。比较了国内煤化工主流卤水处理技术的两种零液排放和两种非零液排放工艺。结果表明,一些主流的零液体排放技术在环境影响、碳足迹和成本方面产生了意想不到的后果。蒸发结晶高矿化度水处理装置是煤制烯烃水处理方法中的关键部件。由于使用了能源密集型设备来蒸发水,使用蒸发结晶装置的过程成本几乎是不使用蒸发结晶装置的两倍,碳足迹增加了24.3%至117.4%。从蒸发过程中获得的氯化钠等盐产品的收益远远低于其成本,并且会产生含盐的有机污染,从而增加了环境风险。由于碳中和的目标,液体零排放技术必须解决废盐产生和高能耗两大问题。到2050年,通过使用绿色能源替代品、技术创新和减少碳排放,可以减少196 - 423kt的碳排放。这为缺水地区煤化工零液体排放技术的未来发展提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
A multi-scale investigation of the effect of cement mortar coating on the small-strain shear stiffness of recycled concrete aggregate Pelletization and gasification of spruce sawdust employing various industrial waste as binders An integrated approach towards utilizing bittern for chemicals recovery: Technoeconomic and sustainability analysis Phosphorus activation in sewage sludge ash: Enhancing bioavailability through chemical modification Socio-demographic and waste system determinants of recycling performance across Australian municipalities: a spatial analysis highlighting urban and regional differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1