Numerical investigations of liquid–liquid extraction through a coiled tube integrated with an extraction outlet

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2025.110310
Almoatasem-Bellah K. Abdelnaeem , Dominique Thévenin , Katharina Zähringer , Abouelmagd Abdelsamie , Michael Mansour
{"title":"Numerical investigations of liquid–liquid extraction through a coiled tube integrated with an extraction outlet","authors":"Almoatasem-Bellah K. Abdelnaeem ,&nbsp;Dominique Thévenin ,&nbsp;Katharina Zähringer ,&nbsp;Abouelmagd Abdelsamie ,&nbsp;Michael Mansour","doi":"10.1016/j.cep.2025.110310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study numerically investigates the extraction of two immiscible liquids through coiled tubes integrated with an extraction outlet. Assuming a fully mixed initial state, representing the worst-case scenario, the research explores optimal conditions for achieving pure extraction of each liquid through different outlets. Two laminar Reynolds numbers of 225 and 563, along with seven different outlet split ratios, were analyzed for horizontal-axis coiled tubes. The effects of geometrical parameters and flow conditions on extraction efficiency were examined. For an inlet amine volume fraction of 50%, the results indicate that optimal extraction occurs at a split ratio of 0.5, with enhanced performance at Re = 563 compared to Re = 225. Sharp-edged, constant-diameter extraction tubes outperformed rounded and nozzle-type configurations while reducing the extraction tube diameter diminished the efficiency. Furthermore, an extraction at a coil angle of 675° (2 turns minus 45°) provided better efficiency compared to 765° (2 turns plus 45°). It is therefore recommended to operate near Re = 563, utilize a straight extraction tube with the same diameter as the coiled tube, and employ a sharp-edged connection at a coil angle of 675°. The extraction split ratio should align with the inlet rate of the lighter phase.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9929,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 110310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S025527012500159X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study numerically investigates the extraction of two immiscible liquids through coiled tubes integrated with an extraction outlet. Assuming a fully mixed initial state, representing the worst-case scenario, the research explores optimal conditions for achieving pure extraction of each liquid through different outlets. Two laminar Reynolds numbers of 225 and 563, along with seven different outlet split ratios, were analyzed for horizontal-axis coiled tubes. The effects of geometrical parameters and flow conditions on extraction efficiency were examined. For an inlet amine volume fraction of 50%, the results indicate that optimal extraction occurs at a split ratio of 0.5, with enhanced performance at Re = 563 compared to Re = 225. Sharp-edged, constant-diameter extraction tubes outperformed rounded and nozzle-type configurations while reducing the extraction tube diameter diminished the efficiency. Furthermore, an extraction at a coil angle of 675° (2 turns minus 45°) provided better efficiency compared to 765° (2 turns plus 45°). It is therefore recommended to operate near Re = 563, utilize a straight extraction tube with the same diameter as the coiled tube, and employ a sharp-edged connection at a coil angle of 675°. The extraction split ratio should align with the inlet rate of the lighter phase.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带抽吸口的螺旋管液液萃取的数值研究
本研究采用数值方法研究了两种不混相液体通过带萃取出口的盘管的萃取过程。假设完全混合的初始状态,代表最坏的情况,研究探索通过不同出口实现每种液体纯提取的最佳条件。对水平轴螺旋管的两种层流雷诺数225和563以及7种不同的出口劈裂比进行了分析。考察了几何参数和流动条件对萃取效率的影响。当进口胺体积分数为50%时,劈裂比为0.5时提取效果最佳,且在Re = 563时的提取效果优于Re = 225时。边缘锋利、直径恒定的抽油管优于圆形和喷嘴型抽油管,而减小抽油管直径会降低效率。此外,与线圈倾角为765°(2匝加45°)相比,线圈倾角为675°(2匝减45°)的抽吸效率更高。因此,建议在Re = 563附近操作,使用与线圈管直径相同的直抽管,并在线圈角675°处采用锐边连接。萃取分离比应与较轻相的进口速率一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.30%
发文量
408
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification is intended for practicing researchers in industry and academia, working in the field of Process Engineering and related to the subject of Process Intensification.Articles published in the Journal demonstrate how novel discoveries, developments and theories in the field of Process Engineering and in particular Process Intensification may be used for analysis and design of innovative equipment and processing methods with substantially improved sustainability, efficiency and environmental performance.
期刊最新文献
Multistage extraction of bioactives from yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) leaf residue: Modeling and chemical profiling Clean and efficient photovoltaic silver powder manufacturing: The whole process design from silver ingot to photovoltaic back/front silver powder Microwave-assisted methane decomposition as a route to functional carbon product over La-promoted Ni supported on mesoporous carbon Performance promotion of helical-finned jackets for stirred tank using dimple structures Development of a biocatalytic process for producing lauryl esters (cosmetic emollients) via esterification in organic solvent-free systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1