“Does this dick make my rights look bigger?”: Transmittance and transgression of neoliberal feminism on Instagram

IF 3.1 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Discourse Context & Media Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100883
Maeve Eberhardt
{"title":"“Does this dick make my rights look bigger?”: Transmittance and transgression of neoliberal feminism on Instagram","authors":"Maeve Eberhardt","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court in 2022 caused a profound shift in the right to abortion across the United States. With the removal of legal protection at the federal level, many individual states swiftly passed legislation banning abortion within their borders. In the current paper, I apply Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis and multimodal techniques to a corpus of posts hashtagged with #abortionrights, to interrogate how messages of abortion rights are mobilized on Instagram. Tagging posts with #abortionrights reaches a wide audience through the invocation of a dominant, rights-based understanding of abortion. This transmits the hegemonic positionality of neoliberal feminism, and simultaneously transgresses dominant messaging by bringing intersectional feminism into sharp focus. In this way, I argue, social media bares its potential to contribute to a larger, activist agenda that moves us towards social justice and change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 100883"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Context & Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695825000327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court in 2022 caused a profound shift in the right to abortion across the United States. With the removal of legal protection at the federal level, many individual states swiftly passed legislation banning abortion within their borders. In the current paper, I apply Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis and multimodal techniques to a corpus of posts hashtagged with #abortionrights, to interrogate how messages of abortion rights are mobilized on Instagram. Tagging posts with #abortionrights reaches a wide audience through the invocation of a dominant, rights-based understanding of abortion. This transmits the hegemonic positionality of neoliberal feminism, and simultaneously transgresses dominant messaging by bringing intersectional feminism into sharp focus. In this way, I argue, social media bares its potential to contribute to a larger, activist agenda that moves us towards social justice and change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这个鸡巴是不是让我的权利看起来更大了?”: Instagram上新自由主义女权主义的透射与越界
2022年,最高法院推翻了罗伊诉韦德案,在美国各地引发了堕胎权的深刻转变。随着联邦层面法律保护的取消,许多州迅速通过了禁止在其境内堕胎的立法。在本文中,我将女权主义批评话语分析和多模态技术应用于标签为#abortionrights的帖子语料库,以询问堕胎权利的信息是如何在Instagram上被动员起来的。通过调用对堕胎的主流、基于权利的理解,给帖子贴上#abortionrights标签可以吸引广泛的受众。这传递了新自由主义女权主义的霸权地位,同时通过将交叉女权主义带入尖锐的焦点而超越了主导信息。我认为,通过这种方式,社交媒体展现了它的潜力,可以为推动我们走向社会正义和变革的更大、更积极的议程做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Context & Media
Discourse Context & Media COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
From exile to visibility: Performative translation and identity construction of TikTok refugees on Xiaohongshu Editorial Board Intermodal meaning-making in digital protests: Text-visual relations in Kenya’s #JusticeForKianjokomaBrothers tweets Voicing the past: How voice strategy shapes narrative in history documentary Granularising digital diplomacy: a multimodal analysis of China MFA spokesperson’s highlights on X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1