Port Cleaner Trucks and Environmental Justice in the Greater New York Area

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179396
Yeonkyeong Gina Park, H. Oliver Gao
{"title":"Port Cleaner Trucks and Environmental Justice in the Greater New York Area","authors":"Yeonkyeong Gina Park,&nbsp;H. Oliver Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines local air pollution levels in disadvantaged neighborhoods near ports after the adoption of cleaner diesel trucks under the Port Drayage Truck Replacement Programs (TRPs). Using annual air pollutant data and census demographics at the tract level, we estimate changes in air quality through a Difference-in-Differences-in-Differences (DDD) model. Our findings indicate that the impact of TRPs was mixed: near-port Black/African American communities were likely worse off, while near-port Hispanic/Latinos saw improvements. Since 2010, air quality improvements in Greater New York (GNY) were 4.5% greater than in near-port communities. Black-majority tracts near ports experienced 6.4% higher NO<sub>2</sub> than Black-majority tracts in GNY. Within near-port areas, Black-majority tracts had 2.7% higher NO<sub>2</sub> than non-Black-majority tracts. The relative gap between Black and non-Black populations in near-port areas widened by about 2% compared to GNY. Conversely, near-port Hispanic-majority tracts had NO<sub>2</sub> levels similar to GNY Black-majority and near-port non-Hispanic-majority areas, with the relative gap between Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations in near-port areas narrowing by 4% compared to GNY. These disparities highlight the disproportionate benefits and drawbacks of TRPs, underscoring the need for more targeted interventions. To address these inequities, we recommend an integrated policy approach, including interstate collaboration to standardize truck regulations, stricter on-road emission controls in near-port areas, and accelerated adoption of clean technologies like electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. These actions could reduce environmental health disparities and promote environmental justice by addressing the systemic vulnerabilities of near-port communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"979 ","pages":"Article 179396"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines local air pollution levels in disadvantaged neighborhoods near ports after the adoption of cleaner diesel trucks under the Port Drayage Truck Replacement Programs (TRPs). Using annual air pollutant data and census demographics at the tract level, we estimate changes in air quality through a Difference-in-Differences-in-Differences (DDD) model. Our findings indicate that the impact of TRPs was mixed: near-port Black/African American communities were likely worse off, while near-port Hispanic/Latinos saw improvements. Since 2010, air quality improvements in Greater New York (GNY) were 4.5% greater than in near-port communities. Black-majority tracts near ports experienced 6.4% higher NO2 than Black-majority tracts in GNY. Within near-port areas, Black-majority tracts had 2.7% higher NO2 than non-Black-majority tracts. The relative gap between Black and non-Black populations in near-port areas widened by about 2% compared to GNY. Conversely, near-port Hispanic-majority tracts had NO2 levels similar to GNY Black-majority and near-port non-Hispanic-majority areas, with the relative gap between Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations in near-port areas narrowing by 4% compared to GNY. These disparities highlight the disproportionate benefits and drawbacks of TRPs, underscoring the need for more targeted interventions. To address these inequities, we recommend an integrated policy approach, including interstate collaboration to standardize truck regulations, stricter on-road emission controls in near-port areas, and accelerated adoption of clean technologies like electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. These actions could reduce environmental health disparities and promote environmental justice by addressing the systemic vulnerabilities of near-port communities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大纽约地区的港口清洁卡车和环境正义
本文研究了在港口拖运卡车更换计划(TRPs)下采用更清洁的柴油卡车后,港口附近弱势社区的当地空气污染水平。利用年度空气污染物数据和地区层面的人口普查统计数据,我们通过差异中的差异(DDD)模型估计了空气质量的变化。我们的研究结果表明,trp的影响是喜忧参半的:港口附近的黑人/非洲裔美国人社区的情况可能更糟,而港口附近的西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区则有所改善。自2010年以来,大纽约地区(GNY)的空气质量改善比港口附近社区高出4.5%。在纽约,港口附近黑人占多数的地区的二氧化氮比黑人占多数的地区高6.4%。在近港口地区,黑人占多数的地区二氧化氮含量比非黑人占多数的地区高2.7%。在港口附近地区,黑人和非黑人人口之间的相对差距与年增长率相比扩大了约2%。相反,近港口西班牙裔占多数的地区的二氧化氮水平与GNY黑人占多数和近港口非西班牙裔占多数的地区相似,近港口地区西班牙裔和非西班牙裔人口之间的相对差距与GNY相比缩小了4%。这些差异凸显了方案的惠益和弊端不成比例,强调需要采取更有针对性的干预措施。为了解决这些不公平问题,我们建议采取综合政策,包括州际合作,使卡车法规标准化,在港口附近地区实施更严格的道路排放控制,加速采用电动和氢燃料电池汽车等清洁技术。这些行动可以通过解决港口附近社区的系统脆弱性,减少环境卫生差距,促进环境正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of inhaled exposures on the upper respiratory tract microbiome: a systematic review Harnessing fungi and bacteria to speed up the biodegradation of plastic mulch films Continuum of denitrification to end-member controls on nitrate isotopic ratios: evidence from meta-analyses and a six-year record of seasonality from Kentucky, USA Biochemical responses and ingestion of microplastics by native fishes in the Atlantic Forest, southern Brazil Land management controls on snow accumulation in a cold-region agricultural watershed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1