How to determine the leaf area index (LAI) of forests: A comparison of forest inventory versus satellite-driven estimates

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecosystems Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100332
Muhammed Sinan, Hubert Hasenauer
{"title":"How to determine the leaf area index (LAI) of forests: A comparison of forest inventory versus satellite-driven estimates","authors":"Muhammed Sinan,&nbsp;Hubert Hasenauer","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf area index (LAI) is a key measure of forest stand physiology and biomass production, and is essential within ecosystem modeling. There are two common approaches to obtaining LAI: (i) terrestrial forest inventory-based “bottom–up”, and (ii) satellite-based “top–down” techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare terrestrial LAI from allometric functions applied to more than 30,000 trees of the Austrian National Forest Inventory (NFI) vs. satellite-based LAI estimates obtained from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Sentinel (Sentinel-3 TOC reflectance and PROBA-V) data across Austrian forests. We analyzed a satellite pixel-to-plot aggregation and obtained the full inventory data set for the LAI comparison. The results suggest that terrestrial vs. satellite (MODIS and Sentinel) driven LAI estimates are consistent, but (i) the variation of the terrestrial forest inventory LAI is larger vs. the pixel average LAI from satellite data, and (ii) any satellite LAI estimation needs a forest stand density correction if the crown competition factor (CCF), a measure for stand density, is ​&lt; ​250 to avoid an overestimation in LAI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562025000417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key measure of forest stand physiology and biomass production, and is essential within ecosystem modeling. There are two common approaches to obtaining LAI: (i) terrestrial forest inventory-based “bottom–up”, and (ii) satellite-based “top–down” techniques. The purpose of this study is to compare terrestrial LAI from allometric functions applied to more than 30,000 trees of the Austrian National Forest Inventory (NFI) vs. satellite-based LAI estimates obtained from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Sentinel (Sentinel-3 TOC reflectance and PROBA-V) data across Austrian forests. We analyzed a satellite pixel-to-plot aggregation and obtained the full inventory data set for the LAI comparison. The results suggest that terrestrial vs. satellite (MODIS and Sentinel) driven LAI estimates are consistent, but (i) the variation of the terrestrial forest inventory LAI is larger vs. the pixel average LAI from satellite data, and (ii) any satellite LAI estimation needs a forest stand density correction if the crown competition factor (CCF), a measure for stand density, is ​< ​250 to avoid an overestimation in LAI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何确定森林的叶面积指数(LAI):森林清查与卫星估算的比较
叶面积指数(LAI)是林分生理和生物量生产的重要指标,在生态系统建模中具有重要意义。获取LAI有两种常见方法:(i)基于陆地森林清查的“自下而上”技术和(ii)基于卫星的“自上而下”技术。本研究的目的是比较奥地利国家森林调查(NFI)中3万多棵树木的异速生长函数与奥地利森林中中分辨率成像光谱辐射计(MODIS)和Sentinel (Sentinel-3 TOC反射率和PROBA-V)数据获得的基于卫星的LAI估计值。我们分析了卫星像素到图的聚合,并获得了用于LAI比较的完整清单数据集。结果表明,陆地和卫星(MODIS和Sentinel)驱动的LAI估计值是一致的,但(i)陆地森林清盘LAI的变化大于卫星数据的像元平均LAI, (ii)任何卫星LAI估计值都需要对林分密度进行校正,如果测量林分密度的树冠竞争因子(CCF)为<;250,以避免LAI的高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Dominant species stability outweighs species asynchrony and diversity in regulating temperate forest regeneration Altitudinal variation in drought resilience of Tianshan spruce (Picea schrenkiana) in the Middle Tianshan Mountains, China Understory functional trait adaptation to climate change is primarily mediated by soil conditions under long-term afforestation on the Loess Plateau A global meta-analysis reveals coupled biogeochemical and microbial successional trajectories in forest soils A resilience dichotomy in mangrove forests: Native resistance versus exotic compensation to climatic and tidal extremes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1