The neurophysiological mechanisms of emotional conflict are influenced by social associations information of varying valence

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2025-07-04 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109154
Ronglian Zheng , Yihan Wu , Huili Xing , Yining Kou , Yufeng Wang , Xin Wu , Feng Zou , Mei Du , Meng Zhang
{"title":"The neurophysiological mechanisms of emotional conflict are influenced by social associations information of varying valence","authors":"Ronglian Zheng ,&nbsp;Yihan Wu ,&nbsp;Huili Xing ,&nbsp;Yining Kou ,&nbsp;Yufeng Wang ,&nbsp;Xin Wu ,&nbsp;Feng Zou ,&nbsp;Mei Du ,&nbsp;Meng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has indicated that emotional valence can influence the resolution of emotional conflicts, with this effect benefiting from the prioritized processing of negative emotions. In this study, a social learning paradigm was utilized to train participants to associate different neutral faces with distinct social meanings (e.g., stingy, generous). These learned neutral faces were then combined with emotion words of varying valence to create a novel face-word Stroop task. This task was employed to investigate whether social affective associations of different valences continue to impact emotional conflict processing. Concurrently, electroencephalogram data was recorded while participants completed the task. Behavioral results revealed that when participants were presented with neutral faces associated with negative social associations, emotional conflict resolution is facilitated, whereas when faced with neutral faces linked to positive social associations, the emotional conflict effect was significantly present. Consistency between event-related potentials and microstate results indicated that negative social associations facilitated conflict resolution, while positive social associations required participants to recruit more cognitive resources to inhibit irrelevant emotional interference. These findings further expand the factors influencing emotional conflict and relevant neurophysiological explanations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 109154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393225000892","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that emotional valence can influence the resolution of emotional conflicts, with this effect benefiting from the prioritized processing of negative emotions. In this study, a social learning paradigm was utilized to train participants to associate different neutral faces with distinct social meanings (e.g., stingy, generous). These learned neutral faces were then combined with emotion words of varying valence to create a novel face-word Stroop task. This task was employed to investigate whether social affective associations of different valences continue to impact emotional conflict processing. Concurrently, electroencephalogram data was recorded while participants completed the task. Behavioral results revealed that when participants were presented with neutral faces associated with negative social associations, emotional conflict resolution is facilitated, whereas when faced with neutral faces linked to positive social associations, the emotional conflict effect was significantly present. Consistency between event-related potentials and microstate results indicated that negative social associations facilitated conflict resolution, while positive social associations required participants to recruit more cognitive resources to inhibit irrelevant emotional interference. These findings further expand the factors influencing emotional conflict and relevant neurophysiological explanations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
情绪冲突的神经生理机制受到不同效价的社会关联信息的影响
先前的研究表明,情绪效价可以影响情绪冲突的解决,这种影响得益于对负面情绪的优先处理。本研究采用社会学习范式训练被试将不同的中性面孔与不同的社会意义(如吝啬、慷慨)联系起来。然后将这些习得的中性面孔与不同效价的情感词汇结合起来,创造出一项新的脸-词Stroop任务。本实验旨在探讨不同效价的社会情感关联是否持续影响情绪冲突加工。同时,在参与者完成任务时记录脑电图数据。行为结果表明,当被试面对与消极社会联想相关的中性面孔时,情绪冲突的解决得到了促进,而面对与积极社会联想相关的中性面孔时,情绪冲突的解决效果显著。事件相关电位与微观状态结果的一致性表明,消极的社会关联促进了冲突的解决,而积极的社会关联需要参与者招募更多的认知资源来抑制不相关的情绪干扰。这些发现进一步拓展了影响情绪冲突的因素和相关的神经生理学解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Aphantasia and visual working memory: No direct evidence of impaired visual working memory in aphantasics, either in behavioral performance or the accuracy of a multivoxel pattern classifier Challenging dual-coding theory: Picture superiority effects persist in aphantasia Sparsity and memory constraints interact with training sequence to bias learning of associative maps Instantaneous emotion sharing: Early brain signatures of understanding expressive communicative actions An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1