Should educators be concerned? The impact of short videos on rational thinking and learning: A comparative analysis

IF 10.5 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105330
Thorsten Otto
{"title":"Should educators be concerned? The impact of short videos on rational thinking and learning: A comparative analysis","authors":"Thorsten Otto","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Short videos are highly attractive and are becoming increasingly popular among young adults due to their unique properties. However, they also pose a risk of getting used to surface processing and suppressing slow analytic thinking. So far, little is known about the potential impact of short video use (SVU) on learning variables. Therefore, this series of studies aimed to examine the consequences of SVU on rational thinking, academic delay of gratification (ADOG), and a surface learning approach (Study 1) and examine the situational impact of watching a short video collection on those variables except ADOG (Study 2). Further, it was examined whether short video-based learning material is suitable for teaching low-complex material (Study 2). In Study 1, participants (<em>n</em> = 169) completed questionnaires regarding SVU, rational thinking, ADOG, and surface learning approach. For Study 2, participants (<em>n</em> = 123) took part in an online experiment with a 2 (short video collection; present vs. not present) x 2 (learning material; short video-based vs. text-based) between-subject design, completed questionnaires regarding SVU, rational thinking, surface learning approach and answered a quiz regarding knowledge acquisition. The findings reveal that SVU is negatively associated with rational thinking and positively associated with a surface learning approach. Watching a short video collection led to a higher situational surface learning approach, and participants who learned with short videos scored lower on the quiz than those who learned with text. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 105330"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short videos are highly attractive and are becoming increasingly popular among young adults due to their unique properties. However, they also pose a risk of getting used to surface processing and suppressing slow analytic thinking. So far, little is known about the potential impact of short video use (SVU) on learning variables. Therefore, this series of studies aimed to examine the consequences of SVU on rational thinking, academic delay of gratification (ADOG), and a surface learning approach (Study 1) and examine the situational impact of watching a short video collection on those variables except ADOG (Study 2). Further, it was examined whether short video-based learning material is suitable for teaching low-complex material (Study 2). In Study 1, participants (n = 169) completed questionnaires regarding SVU, rational thinking, ADOG, and surface learning approach. For Study 2, participants (n = 123) took part in an online experiment with a 2 (short video collection; present vs. not present) x 2 (learning material; short video-based vs. text-based) between-subject design, completed questionnaires regarding SVU, rational thinking, surface learning approach and answered a quiz regarding knowledge acquisition. The findings reveal that SVU is negatively associated with rational thinking and positively associated with a surface learning approach. Watching a short video collection led to a higher situational surface learning approach, and participants who learned with short videos scored lower on the quiz than those who learned with text. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育工作者应该担心吗?短视频对理性思维和学习的影响:比较分析
短视频非常有吸引力,由于其独特的属性,越来越受到年轻人的欢迎。然而,它们也会带来习惯于表面处理和抑制缓慢分析思维的风险。到目前为止,关于短视频使用(SVU)对学习变量的潜在影响知之甚少。因此,本系列研究旨在检验SVU对理性思维、学业满足延迟(ADOG)和表面学习方法的影响(研究1),并检验观看短视频集对除ADOG之外的其他变量的情境影响(研究2)。此外,研究2还检验了基于短视频的学习材料是否适合于教授低复杂度的材料(研究2)。在研究1中,参与者(n = 169)完成了SVU问卷调查。理性思维,ADOG和表面学习方法。在研究2中,参与者(n = 123)参加了一个2(短视频集合)的在线实验;出席与不出席)× 2(学习材料;(短视频vs.文本)受试者间设计,完成SVU、理性思维、表面学习方法的问卷调查,并回答知识获取的测验。研究结果表明,SVU与理性思维呈负相关,与表面学习方法呈正相关。观看短视频集导致更高的情景表面学习方法,通过短视频学习的参与者在测试中的得分低于通过文本学习的参与者。讨论了局限性、影响和未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Pixels and pedagogy: MISTT's insights into evolving teacher identities when technology comes to play Gaining tolerance of immigrants through simulating migratory experiences: Quasi-experimental evidence from secondary school classrooms Feedback practices with teacher dashboards in primary education: Exploring dashboard-prompted feedback across lesson phases Longitudinal relationships between student ethical considerations, behavioral intention, and perceived knowledge in artificial intelligence education A critical examination of blockchain in education: A hybrid bibliometric and content analysis of sociotechnical imaginaries and pedagogical marginality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1