Comprehensive personality structure in the Persian language: High-dimensionality analyses of trait adjectives.

IF 6.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of personality and social psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1037/pspp0000557
Naser Aghababaei,Gerard Saucier,Vinita Vader,Pooya Razavi
{"title":"Comprehensive personality structure in the Persian language: High-dimensionality analyses of trait adjectives.","authors":"Naser Aghababaei,Gerard Saucier,Vinita Vader,Pooya Razavi","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely known that all languages have personality-trait concepts, but more controversial is how these concepts are organized (structured) based on application to actual human targets of description. Many assume that Big Five factors provide a universally applicable structural template, but evidence beyond European languages has particularly undermined this premise. The comparative reproducibility, across cultures, of structures of few broad factors (more parsimonious) versus many fine-grained factors (more comprehensive and predictive) also remains unclear. Here, issues of reproducibility and universality are examined in reference to real-person data from the non-Western cultural context associated with the Persian language. Self-reports from 767 Iranian adults employing 360 Persian personality terms were analyzed by both high-dimensionality and traditional approaches. Imported Big Five and six-factor structures were not well-supported. Although few-factor structures of one or eight factors showed the highest reproducibility (across method variations) in absolute terms, more comprehensive structures (of 20 or 42 factors) accounting for far more variance were nearly as reproducible, suggesting distinct structural layers, hierarchical only to a partial degree in a hierarchy. The 42-factor structure revealed not just many contents quite comparable to well-understood Western trait concepts but also some intriguing relatively culture-specific contents, thus indicating in a novel way how personality-structure studies can be revealing of culture and cultural differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000557","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is widely known that all languages have personality-trait concepts, but more controversial is how these concepts are organized (structured) based on application to actual human targets of description. Many assume that Big Five factors provide a universally applicable structural template, but evidence beyond European languages has particularly undermined this premise. The comparative reproducibility, across cultures, of structures of few broad factors (more parsimonious) versus many fine-grained factors (more comprehensive and predictive) also remains unclear. Here, issues of reproducibility and universality are examined in reference to real-person data from the non-Western cultural context associated with the Persian language. Self-reports from 767 Iranian adults employing 360 Persian personality terms were analyzed by both high-dimensionality and traditional approaches. Imported Big Five and six-factor structures were not well-supported. Although few-factor structures of one or eight factors showed the highest reproducibility (across method variations) in absolute terms, more comprehensive structures (of 20 or 42 factors) accounting for far more variance were nearly as reproducible, suggesting distinct structural layers, hierarchical only to a partial degree in a hierarchy. The 42-factor structure revealed not just many contents quite comparable to well-understood Western trait concepts but also some intriguing relatively culture-specific contents, thus indicating in a novel way how personality-structure studies can be revealing of culture and cultural differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语的综合人格结构:特征形容词的高维分析。
众所周知,所有的语言都有个性特征概念,但更有争议的是,这些概念是如何根据对实际人类目标的描述来组织(结构化)的。许多人认为五大因素提供了一个普遍适用的结构模板,但欧洲语言之外的证据尤其破坏了这一前提。在不同的文化背景下,较少的广泛因素(更简洁)与许多细粒度因素(更全面和可预测)的结构的比较再现性仍然不清楚。在这里,再现性和普遍性的问题是在参考与波斯语相关的非西方文化背景下的真实数据进行检查。采用高维和传统方法分析了767名伊朗成年人使用360个波斯语人格术语的自我报告。进口的大五因素和六因素结构没有得到很好的支持。虽然一个或八个因素的少数因素结构在绝对意义上显示出最高的再现性(跨越方法变化),但更全面的结构(20或42个因素)占更多的方差几乎是可重复的,这表明不同的结构层,在层次结构中仅在部分程度上分层。42个因素的结构不仅揭示了许多与众所周知的西方特质概念相当的内容,而且还揭示了一些有趣的相对特定文化的内容,从而以一种新颖的方式表明人格结构研究如何揭示文化和文化差异。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences in risk preference: Selection and socialization effects. The unexpected importance of expectations in self-conscious emotions. Tailoring personality interventions: How timing, context, and strategies influence proximal intervention outcomes. Face the difference: Metacontrast as an affordance to spontaneous social categorization. Fleeting generalization: How unstable belief updating keeps people overly pessimistic about talking to strangers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1