A qualitative investigation of the modifiable determinants of medication adherence in bipolar disorder (BD): Views of patients and their family and friends

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.04.149
Asta Ratna Prajapati , Sion Scott , Alexandra L. Dima , Allan Clark , Jo Taylor , Jonathan Wilson , Debi Bhattacharya
{"title":"A qualitative investigation of the modifiable determinants of medication adherence in bipolar disorder (BD): Views of patients and their family and friends","authors":"Asta Ratna Prajapati ,&nbsp;Sion Scott ,&nbsp;Alexandra L. Dima ,&nbsp;Allan Clark ,&nbsp;Jo Taylor ,&nbsp;Jonathan Wilson ,&nbsp;Debi Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.04.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medication nonadherence in bipolar disorder (BD) can lead to adverse outcomes including relapse, hospitalisation and suicidility. Adherence research traditionally excludes mental health populations and their family and friends, contributing to inequity between physical and mental health. We used behavioural science to characterise modifiable adherence determinants in BD from the perspectives of patients and their family and friends.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Between April-June 2020, we conducted two focus groups and 26 interviews with adults with BD and their family and friends. We explored modifiable adherence determinants which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), followed by a thematic analysis and prioritisation of determinants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-three (including 13 new) adherence determinants, mapped to nine TDF domains, were prioritised. Four themes of adherence determinants emerged: the medication itself; practicalities; how patients perceive themselves, their illness, and treatments; and collaboration between patients, their family and friends, and healthcare professionals. Nine prioritised TDF domains were: ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Intentions’, ‘Emotion’, ‘Social Influences’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision processes’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Social/professional role and identity’. Respective examples include side effects, treatment preferences, fear of not being ‘myself’, relationships with healthcare team, medication affecting life goals, forgetfulness, beliefs about negative consequences, not knowing the risk of stopping medication, and involvement in treatment decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Targeting antecedents of forgetfulness as well as newly identified determinants linked to ‘Emotion’ and ‘Intentions’, may improve adherence. Mapping adherence determinants to TDF domains provides a framework for designing personalised adherence interventions by selecting appropriate behaviour change techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"382 ","pages":"Pages 462-470"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032725007244","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medication nonadherence in bipolar disorder (BD) can lead to adverse outcomes including relapse, hospitalisation and suicidility. Adherence research traditionally excludes mental health populations and their family and friends, contributing to inequity between physical and mental health. We used behavioural science to characterise modifiable adherence determinants in BD from the perspectives of patients and their family and friends.

Method

Between April-June 2020, we conducted two focus groups and 26 interviews with adults with BD and their family and friends. We explored modifiable adherence determinants which were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), followed by a thematic analysis and prioritisation of determinants.

Results

Sixty-three (including 13 new) adherence determinants, mapped to nine TDF domains, were prioritised. Four themes of adherence determinants emerged: the medication itself; practicalities; how patients perceive themselves, their illness, and treatments; and collaboration between patients, their family and friends, and healthcare professionals. Nine prioritised TDF domains were: ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Intentions’, ‘Emotion’, ‘Social Influences’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision processes’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Knowledge’ and ‘Social/professional role and identity’. Respective examples include side effects, treatment preferences, fear of not being ‘myself’, relationships with healthcare team, medication affecting life goals, forgetfulness, beliefs about negative consequences, not knowing the risk of stopping medication, and involvement in treatment decisions.

Conclusion

Targeting antecedents of forgetfulness as well as newly identified determinants linked to ‘Emotion’ and ‘Intentions’, may improve adherence. Mapping adherence determinants to TDF domains provides a framework for designing personalised adherence interventions by selecting appropriate behaviour change techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对双相情感障碍(BD)患者坚持服药的可改变决定因素进行定性调查:患者及其亲友的观点
背景:双相情感障碍(BD)的药物依从性不佳可导致不良后果,包括复发、住院和自杀。依从性研究传统上不包括心理健康人群及其家人和朋友,导致身心健康之间的不平等。我们使用行为科学从患者及其家人和朋友的角度来描述双相障碍中可改变的依从性决定因素。方法在2020年4月至6月期间,我们对成年BD患者及其家人和朋友进行了两个焦点小组和26次访谈。我们探索了可修改的粘附决定因素,这些决定因素被映射到理论领域框架(TDF),然后是主题分析和决定因素的优先级。结果优选了63个(包括13个新发现的)粘附性决定因子,它们被映射到9个TDF结构域。依从性决定因素出现了四个主题:药物本身;实用性;患者如何看待自己、自己的疾病和治疗;以及患者、他们的家人和朋友以及医疗保健专业人员之间的合作。9个优先的TDF领域是:“环境背景和资源”、“意图”、“情感”、“社会影响”、“目标”、“记忆、注意力和决策过程”、“对结果的信念”、“知识”和“社会/职业角色和身份”。相应的例子包括副作用、治疗偏好、害怕不是“我自己”、与医疗团队的关系、药物影响生活目标、健忘、对负面后果的信念、不知道停药的风险以及参与治疗决策。结论:针对健忘的前因以及新发现的与“情绪”和“意图”相关的决定因素,可以提高依从性。将依从性决定因素映射到TDF域为通过选择适当的行为改变技术设计个性化依从性干预提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
期刊最新文献
Task-aware multiple instance learning for stress detection from facial video data Parent-of-origin effects and cross-disorder transmission in familial psychiatric risk: A nationwide study of 1.77 million offspring Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation and heart rate variability in treatment-resistant depression: Evidence for person-specific autonomic phenotypes Do somatic symptoms bias depression screening? Reliability and equivalence of PHQ-8 in those with and without chronic pain: A nationally representative study of U.S. adults Effective connectivity of implicit emotion processing in adolescent psychiatric inpatients: Dynamic causal modeling across bipolar disorder and other psychopathologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1