Stakeholder participation for effective post-disaster risk communication: The role of relationship quality

IF 4.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105510
Rui Yang , Bo Liu , Na Li
{"title":"Stakeholder participation for effective post-disaster risk communication: The role of relationship quality","authors":"Rui Yang ,&nbsp;Bo Liu ,&nbsp;Na Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The stakeholder participation approach (SPA) is widely applied in post-disaster risk communication (PDRC). While existing literature emphasizes the critical role of stakeholder relationships in achieving effective PDRC, our understanding of these relationships and their impact on PDRC effectiveness remains limited. This study addresses this gap by introducing the concept of <em>relationship quality</em> and examining its conceptualization and influence on perceived PDRC effectiveness. Drawing on structural equation modeling (SEM) and survey data from a post-flood reconstruction project in Yan'an, China, the study validates relationship quality as a meaningful construct within the PDRC context, comprising four key dimensions: trust, fairness, communication, and coordination. The results reveal that trust, communication, and coordination serve as chain mediators in the relationship between fairness and PDRC effectiveness. Based on these findings, the study proposes several strategies for enhancing PDRC effectiveness through SPA, including shifting governance from a vertical to a horizontal structure, prioritizing relationship quality management, and recognizing the contributions of individual stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 105510"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925003346","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stakeholder participation approach (SPA) is widely applied in post-disaster risk communication (PDRC). While existing literature emphasizes the critical role of stakeholder relationships in achieving effective PDRC, our understanding of these relationships and their impact on PDRC effectiveness remains limited. This study addresses this gap by introducing the concept of relationship quality and examining its conceptualization and influence on perceived PDRC effectiveness. Drawing on structural equation modeling (SEM) and survey data from a post-flood reconstruction project in Yan'an, China, the study validates relationship quality as a meaningful construct within the PDRC context, comprising four key dimensions: trust, fairness, communication, and coordination. The results reveal that trust, communication, and coordination serve as chain mediators in the relationship between fairness and PDRC effectiveness. Based on these findings, the study proposes several strategies for enhancing PDRC effectiveness through SPA, including shifting governance from a vertical to a horizontal structure, prioritizing relationship quality management, and recognizing the contributions of individual stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者参与有效的灾后风险交流:关系质量的作用
利益相关者参与方法在灾后风险沟通中得到了广泛的应用。虽然现有文献强调利益相关者关系在实现有效PDRC中的关键作用,但我们对这些关系及其对PDRC有效性的影响的理解仍然有限。本研究通过引入关系质量的概念并考察其概念化及其对感知PDRC有效性的影响来解决这一差距。利用结构方程模型(SEM)和中国延安灾后重建项目的调查数据,该研究验证了关系质量在PDRC背景下是一个有意义的结构,包括四个关键维度:信任、公平、沟通和协调。结果表明,信任、沟通和协调在公平与PDRC有效性的关系中起连锁中介作用。基于这些发现,本研究提出了几种通过SPA提高PDRC有效性的策略,包括将治理从垂直结构转变为水平结构,优先考虑关系质量管理,以及认识到个体利益相关者的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Scalable pluvial flood risk assessment: A data-driven framework integrating machine learning (ML) and discrete global grid systems (DGGS H3) Impact-based risk assessment of coastal infrastructure adaptation to climate change: a case study of hurricane risk in Nova Scotia, Canada Connecting perceived flood risk and resilience in Auckland, New Zealand A Bayesian network framework for quantitative analysis of education continuity under earthquake risk: integrating physical and social vulnerabilities Cybersecurity threats, challenges, and strategies in humanitarian operations: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1