Experimental and theoretical investigation on the dynamic response of foam-geopolymer sandwich cylindrical structure under long-duration plane load

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120407
Hang Zhou , Zhen Wang , Haoxiang Chen , Wenxin Wang , Dongming Yan , Kangbo Zhao , Yong He
{"title":"Experimental and theoretical investigation on the dynamic response of foam-geopolymer sandwich cylindrical structure under long-duration plane load","authors":"Hang Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhen Wang ,&nbsp;Haoxiang Chen ,&nbsp;Wenxin Wang ,&nbsp;Dongming Yan ,&nbsp;Kangbo Zhao ,&nbsp;Yong He","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, the dynamic response of the foam-geopolymer sandwich cylindrical structures (FSCS) under long-duration plane shock wave loading and the energy absorption properties of the foam-geopolymer cushion layer were investigated through model-scale blast-resistant experiments and theoretical calculations. Five FSCS models with different cushion layer thicknesses and densities were tested in a large-scale enclosed blast-resistant device. The results found that the FSCS models remained undamaged when subjected to long-duration plane wave loading with a peak pressure of 0.6 MPa and a duration of 200 ms. Increasing the cushion layer thickness enhanced pressure attenuation from 65.31 % at 15 mm to 75.71 % at 25 mm, while lower-density foam-geopolymer materials exhibited better attenuation, reaching 80.59 % at 579 kg/m³ compared to 66.36 % at 1166 kg/m³ . The top of the cylinder experienced pressure four times higher than the lateral center, with peak displacement and acceleration amplitude increasing by 60 % and 90 %, respectively. Circumferential strain was more pronounced than axial strain, while the inner wall of the lining primarily underwent elastic deformation. Furthermore, a dynamic mechanical model for underground circular tunnels under long-duration planar loading was developed, incorporating an optimal cushion layer thickness calculation method that considers material self-weight and impedance effects. This model accurately predicts the deflection variation of underground sandwich cylindrical structures at any time, providing crucial insights for the design and optimization of cushion energy-absorbing layers in sandwich structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"336 ","pages":"Article 120407"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625007989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the dynamic response of the foam-geopolymer sandwich cylindrical structures (FSCS) under long-duration plane shock wave loading and the energy absorption properties of the foam-geopolymer cushion layer were investigated through model-scale blast-resistant experiments and theoretical calculations. Five FSCS models with different cushion layer thicknesses and densities were tested in a large-scale enclosed blast-resistant device. The results found that the FSCS models remained undamaged when subjected to long-duration plane wave loading with a peak pressure of 0.6 MPa and a duration of 200 ms. Increasing the cushion layer thickness enhanced pressure attenuation from 65.31 % at 15 mm to 75.71 % at 25 mm, while lower-density foam-geopolymer materials exhibited better attenuation, reaching 80.59 % at 579 kg/m³ compared to 66.36 % at 1166 kg/m³ . The top of the cylinder experienced pressure four times higher than the lateral center, with peak displacement and acceleration amplitude increasing by 60 % and 90 %, respectively. Circumferential strain was more pronounced than axial strain, while the inner wall of the lining primarily underwent elastic deformation. Furthermore, a dynamic mechanical model for underground circular tunnels under long-duration planar loading was developed, incorporating an optimal cushion layer thickness calculation method that considers material self-weight and impedance effects. This model accurately predicts the deflection variation of underground sandwich cylindrical structures at any time, providing crucial insights for the design and optimization of cushion energy-absorbing layers in sandwich structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泡沫-地聚合物夹层圆柱结构在长时间平面荷载作用下动力响应的试验与理论研究
本研究通过模型规模的抗爆实验和理论计算,研究了泡沫-土工聚合物夹层圆柱形结构(FSCS)在长时间平面冲击波加载下的动态响应以及泡沫-土工聚合物缓冲层的能量吸收特性。在大型封闭式抗爆装置中测试了五种具有不同缓冲层厚度和密度的 FSCS 模型。结果发现,在峰值压力为 0.6 兆帕、持续时间为 200 毫秒的长时间平面波加载下,FSCS 模型保持完好无损。增加缓冲层厚度可提高压力衰减率,从 15 毫米时的 65.31% 提高到 25 毫米时的 75.71%,而密度较低的泡沫-土工聚合物材料的衰减率更高,在 579 kg/m³ 时达到 80.59%,而在 1166 kg/m³ 时为 66.36%。圆柱体顶部承受的压力是横向中心的四倍,峰值位移和加速度振幅分别增加了 60% 和 90%。圆周应变比轴向应变更明显,而衬里内壁主要发生弹性变形。此外,还开发了地下圆形隧道在长时间平面荷载作用下的动态力学模型,其中采用了考虑材料自重和阻抗效应的最佳缓冲层厚度计算方法。该模型准确预测了地下夹层圆柱结构在任何时间的挠度变化,为夹层结构中缓冲吸能层的设计和优化提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Simplified method for verifying ultimate limit state conditions of resistance for masonry shear walls Experimental and numerical investigation of flow-induced vibration in CMC turbine blades using fluid-structure interaction Experimental assessment of micropile flexural capacity at threaded joints subjected to combined axial compression and bending A simple and efficient iterative translation approximation method for simulating stationary non-Gaussian stochastic vector processes An efficient strong seismic analysis model for running safety thresholds of train-track-high pier bridge dynamic system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1