Integrated environmental, economic, and performance assessments of cold recycling technologies for asphalt pavements

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2025-06-30 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108335
Wei Sheng , Yuan Li , Dan Chong , Kecheng Zhao , Yuhong Wang
{"title":"Integrated environmental, economic, and performance assessments of cold recycling technologies for asphalt pavements","authors":"Wei Sheng ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Dan Chong ,&nbsp;Kecheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuhong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cold recycling technologies for asphalt pavements involve using emulsified asphalt binders (CCPREA) or foamed asphalt binders (CCPRFA) with cement additives. They have become increasingly popular for their environmental and resource conservation benefits. Despite the advantages, a comprehensive evaluation framework for these methods is needed. This study introduces an integrated analytical model combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight Method (EWM), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assess the sustainability of both treatments across environmental, economic, and engineering dimensions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results show that CCPREA has higher greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and economic costs than CCPRFA. However, CCPREA demonstrates superior performance. The AHP-EWM-TOPSIS model scores CCPREA at 0.62, higher than CCPRFA's 0.38, in the multi-criteria evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108335"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold recycling technologies for asphalt pavements involve using emulsified asphalt binders (CCPREA) or foamed asphalt binders (CCPRFA) with cement additives. They have become increasingly popular for their environmental and resource conservation benefits. Despite the advantages, a comprehensive evaluation framework for these methods is needed. This study introduces an integrated analytical model combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Entropy Weight Method (EWM), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assess the sustainability of both treatments across environmental, economic, and engineering dimensions. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results show that CCPREA has higher greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, and economic costs than CCPRFA. However, CCPREA demonstrates superior performance. The AHP-EWM-TOPSIS model scores CCPREA at 0.62, higher than CCPRFA's 0.38, in the multi-criteria evaluation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沥青路面冷回收技术的综合环境、经济和性能评价
沥青路面的冷回收技术包括使用乳化沥青粘结剂(CCPREA)或泡沫沥青粘结剂(CCPRFA)与水泥添加剂。它们因其环境和资源节约效益而越来越受欢迎。尽管这些方法有优点,但需要一个全面的评价框架。本研究引入了一个综合分析模型,结合层次分析法(AHP)、熵权法(EWM)和理想解决相似偏好排序法(TOPSIS),从环境、经济和工程维度评估两种处理的可持续性。生命周期评价(LCA)结果表明,CCPREA的温室气体排放、能源消耗和经济成本均高于CCPRFA。然而,CCPREA表现出优越的性能。在多准则评价中,AHP-EWM-TOPSIS模型对CCPREA的评分为0.62,高于CCPRFA的0.38。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
The impacts of input data on visual-language models (VLM) in automated solid waste recognition Conversion of waste steel slag into recyclable carbon capture adsorbent: stabilizing effect of Ca2MnO4 on calcium looping process Global assessment of nitrous oxide mitigation and crop yield enhancement with optimized management strategies Harvests of solar light: Italian agriculture in the age of the photovoltaic era Recycling, recycled content and environmental impacts of electric vehicle batteries – The material circularity and carbon footprint nexus under the EU Batteries Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1