Evaluating social perceptions and diffusion networks of green travel: A case of China with Weibo

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.04.028
Yuan Fu , Junlin Wu , Pete Barbrook-Johnson , Peihan Wen
{"title":"Evaluating social perceptions and diffusion networks of green travel: A case of China with Weibo","authors":"Yuan Fu ,&nbsp;Junlin Wu ,&nbsp;Pete Barbrook-Johnson ,&nbsp;Peihan Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green travel has received positive attention from the Chinese government as a carbon-neutrality tool, but public discourse is mixed. This paper assesses social perceptions and diffusion networks of green travel in China using Weibo, a popular social network. We design a framework integrating sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and network analysis to explore patterns in sentiments and topics on green travel in different socio-demographic groups, and to identify communities and opinion leaders. We find government campaigns are most engaging while focusing on demonstrations and examples of green travel. With increasing age, the proportion of positive sentiment rises while neutral sentiment declines, with little change in negative sentiment. Men are three times more likely than women to show interest in new energy vehicles, and this interest increases with age. Individual users account for a lower proportion of positive sentiment compared to institutions. Governments focus on traffic pollution, whereas media and enterprises emphasis electric vehicles. The largest community of interaction consists of various green travel service companies. Opinion leaders typically include influential governments, companies and celebrities. We conclude by discussing how our detailed findings on public discourse about green travel can help policymakers design targeted interventions to increase green travel acceptance among specific groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 9-25"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green travel has received positive attention from the Chinese government as a carbon-neutrality tool, but public discourse is mixed. This paper assesses social perceptions and diffusion networks of green travel in China using Weibo, a popular social network. We design a framework integrating sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and network analysis to explore patterns in sentiments and topics on green travel in different socio-demographic groups, and to identify communities and opinion leaders. We find government campaigns are most engaging while focusing on demonstrations and examples of green travel. With increasing age, the proportion of positive sentiment rises while neutral sentiment declines, with little change in negative sentiment. Men are three times more likely than women to show interest in new energy vehicles, and this interest increases with age. Individual users account for a lower proportion of positive sentiment compared to institutions. Governments focus on traffic pollution, whereas media and enterprises emphasis electric vehicles. The largest community of interaction consists of various green travel service companies. Opinion leaders typically include influential governments, companies and celebrities. We conclude by discussing how our detailed findings on public discourse about green travel can help policymakers design targeted interventions to increase green travel acceptance among specific groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色出行的社会认知与传播网络评价——以微博为例
绿色出行作为一种碳中和工具得到了中国政府的积极关注,但公众舆论却褒贬不一。本文利用微博这一流行的社交网络,对中国绿色出行的社会认知和传播网络进行了评估。我们设计了一个整合情感分析、主题建模和网络分析的框架,以探索不同社会人口群体对绿色旅行的情感和主题的模式,并确定社区和意见领袖。我们发现,政府的宣传活动最吸引人,因为它关注的是绿色旅行的示范和例子。随着年龄的增长,积极情绪的比例上升,中性情绪的比例下降,消极情绪的比例变化不大。男性对新能源汽车的兴趣是女性的三倍,而且这种兴趣随着年龄的增长而增加。与机构相比,个人用户所占的积极情绪比例较低。政府关注的是交通污染,而媒体和企业强调的是电动汽车。最大的互动社区由各种绿色旅游服务公司组成。意见领袖通常包括有影响力的政府、公司和名人。最后,我们讨论了我们关于绿色旅行的公共话语的详细发现如何帮助决策者设计有针对性的干预措施,以提高特定群体对绿色旅行的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects Rethinking cost–benefit analysis for transformative cycling policies: Integrating behavioral change and the logsum method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1