[Comparative sensitivities of exercise, isoproterenol infusion and cold pressor tests for detecting myocardial ischemia].

Journal of cardiography. Supplement Pub Date : 1987-01-01
R Ajisaka, T Takeda, T Fujita, K Iida, K Yukisada, K Iida, M Matsuda, Y Sugishita, I Ito, M Akisada
{"title":"[Comparative sensitivities of exercise, isoproterenol infusion and cold pressor tests for detecting myocardial ischemia].","authors":"R Ajisaka,&nbsp;T Takeda,&nbsp;T Fujita,&nbsp;K Iida,&nbsp;K Yukisada,&nbsp;K Iida,&nbsp;M Matsuda,&nbsp;Y Sugishita,&nbsp;I Ito,&nbsp;M Akisada","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The comparative sensitivities of exercise (supine ergometer), isoproterenol (ISP) infusion and cold pressor test (CPT) for detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with effort angina (45 cases) and vasospastic angina (16 cases) were investigated. Twenty-three patients with atypical chest pain served as normal controls. Left ventricular function was evaluated by computerized quantitative analysis using the following three graphic methods: 1) radionuclide angiography during exercise (EX-RI) and ISP infusion (ISP-RI), 2) two-dimensional echocardiography during ISP infusion (ISP-2DE) and CPT (CP-2DE) and 3) digital subtraction angiography during CPT (CP-DSA). The incidence of regional wall motion abnormalities (WMA) induced by these three stress tests in patients with effort angina were as follows: 83% in EX-RI, 80% in ISP-2DE, 80% in ISP-RI, 75% in CP-2DE and 86% in CP-DSA. In patients with vasospatic angina, the WMA were as follows: 40% in EX-RI, 0% in ISP-RI and 71% in CP-DSA. In patients with atypical chest pain, the WMA were 0% in EX-RI, 0% in ISP-RI, 8% in ISP-2DE, 13% in CP-2DE and 13% in CP-DSA. The left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was unchanged during ISP (from 65 +/- 11% to 68 +/- 12%) and it decreased both during exercise (from 64 +/- 10% to 58 +/- 9%, p less than 0.05) and during CPT (from 69 +/- 10% to 65 +/- 9%, p less than 0.05) in patients with effort angina. In patients with vasospastic angina, the EF was unchanged both during exercise (from 70 +/- 7% to 68 +/- 13%) and during the CPT (from 76 +/- 5% to 75 +/- 4%), while it increased during ISP infusion (from 63 +/- 8% to 79 +/- 7%, p less than 0.01). In patients with atypical chest pain, the EF was increased both during exercise (from 72 +/- 7% to 79 +/- 5%, p less than 0.01) and during ISP infusion (from 67 +/- 5% to 78 +/- 7%, p less than 0.01), while it was unchanged during CPT (from 77 +/- 7% to 76 +/- 8%). In exercise and in ISP infusion tests, WMA were provoked concomitantly with ST segment deviations in nearly all patients. However, during CPT, WMA were produced without the occurrence of ST segment deviations. Myocardial ischemia due to organic coronary artery stenosis was difficult to distinguish from coronary artery spasm by exercise test. However, the susceptibility to ISP infusion and CPT differed in producing WMA in patients with vasospastic angina.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiography. Supplement","volume":"12 ","pages":"3-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiography. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The comparative sensitivities of exercise (supine ergometer), isoproterenol (ISP) infusion and cold pressor test (CPT) for detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with effort angina (45 cases) and vasospastic angina (16 cases) were investigated. Twenty-three patients with atypical chest pain served as normal controls. Left ventricular function was evaluated by computerized quantitative analysis using the following three graphic methods: 1) radionuclide angiography during exercise (EX-RI) and ISP infusion (ISP-RI), 2) two-dimensional echocardiography during ISP infusion (ISP-2DE) and CPT (CP-2DE) and 3) digital subtraction angiography during CPT (CP-DSA). The incidence of regional wall motion abnormalities (WMA) induced by these three stress tests in patients with effort angina were as follows: 83% in EX-RI, 80% in ISP-2DE, 80% in ISP-RI, 75% in CP-2DE and 86% in CP-DSA. In patients with vasospatic angina, the WMA were as follows: 40% in EX-RI, 0% in ISP-RI and 71% in CP-DSA. In patients with atypical chest pain, the WMA were 0% in EX-RI, 0% in ISP-RI, 8% in ISP-2DE, 13% in CP-2DE and 13% in CP-DSA. The left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was unchanged during ISP (from 65 +/- 11% to 68 +/- 12%) and it decreased both during exercise (from 64 +/- 10% to 58 +/- 9%, p less than 0.05) and during CPT (from 69 +/- 10% to 65 +/- 9%, p less than 0.05) in patients with effort angina. In patients with vasospastic angina, the EF was unchanged both during exercise (from 70 +/- 7% to 68 +/- 13%) and during the CPT (from 76 +/- 5% to 75 +/- 4%), while it increased during ISP infusion (from 63 +/- 8% to 79 +/- 7%, p less than 0.01). In patients with atypical chest pain, the EF was increased both during exercise (from 72 +/- 7% to 79 +/- 5%, p less than 0.01) and during ISP infusion (from 67 +/- 5% to 78 +/- 7%, p less than 0.01), while it was unchanged during CPT (from 77 +/- 7% to 76 +/- 8%). In exercise and in ISP infusion tests, WMA were provoked concomitantly with ST segment deviations in nearly all patients. However, during CPT, WMA were produced without the occurrence of ST segment deviations. Myocardial ischemia due to organic coronary artery stenosis was difficult to distinguish from coronary artery spasm by exercise test. However, the susceptibility to ISP infusion and CPT differed in producing WMA in patients with vasospastic angina.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[运动、异丙肾上腺素输注和冷压试验检测心肌缺血的比较敏感性]。
研究运动(仰卧测功仪)、异丙肾上腺素(ISP)输注、冷压试验(CPT)对45例功劳型心绞痛和16例血管痉挛型心绞痛患者心肌缺血检测的比较敏感性。23例非典型胸痛患者作为正常对照。采用以下三种成像方法对左心室功能进行计算机定量分析:1)运动期间放射性核素血管造影(EX-RI)和ISP输注(ISP- ri), 2) ISP输注期间二维超声心动图(ISP- 2de)和CPT (CP-2DE), 3) CPT期间数字减影血管造影(CP-DSA)。三种应激试验诱发的区域性壁运动异常发生率分别为:EX-RI组83%,ISP-2DE组80%,ISP-RI组80%,CP-2DE组75%,CP-DSA组86%。血管痉挛性心绞痛患者的WMA如下:EX-RI为40%,ISP-RI为0%,CP-DSA为71%。在非典型胸痛患者中,EX-RI组WMA为0%,ISP-RI组为0%,ISP-2DE组为8%,CP-2DE组为13%,CP-DSA组为13%。用力性心绞痛患者的左室射血分数(EF)在ISP期间(从65 +/- 11%降至68 +/- 12%)不变,在运动期间(从64 +/- 10%降至58 +/- 9%,p < 0.05)和CPT期间(从69 +/- 10%降至65 +/- 9%,p < 0.05)均有所下降。在血管痉挛性心绞痛患者中,EF在运动期间(从70 +/- 7%到68 +/- 13%)和CPT期间(从76 +/- 5%到75 +/- 4%)保持不变,而在ISP输注期间EF增加(从63 +/- 8%到79 +/- 7%,p < 0.01)。在非典型胸痛患者中,EF在运动期间(从72 +/- 7%增加到79 +/- 5%,p < 0.01)和在ISP输注期间(从67 +/- 5%增加到78 +/- 7%,p < 0.01)增加,而在CPT期间(从77 +/- 7%增加到76 +/- 8%)保持不变。在运动和ISP输注试验中,几乎所有患者的WMA都伴随着ST段偏差。然而,在CPT期间,WMA的产生没有发生ST段偏差。器质性冠状动脉狭窄引起的心肌缺血与冠状动脉痉挛在运动试验中难以区分。然而,血管痉挛性心绞痛患者对ISP输注和CPT的易感性在产生WMA方面存在差异。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Quantitative evaluation of regional myocardial blood flow by digital subtraction angiography: correlations with exercise electrocardiography and Tl-201 myocardial scintigraphy]. [Comparative sensitivities of exercise, isoproterenol infusion and cold pressor tests for detecting myocardial ischemia]. [Myocardial perfusion detected using digital subtraction angiography as compared with X-ray CT and Tl-201 myocardial imaging]. [Symposium: Usefulness and limitations of various methods in diagnosing myocardial ischemia]. [Diagnostic evaluation of ischemic heart disease by X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1