Semen donors in New Zealand: their characteristics and attitudes.

Clinical reproduction and fertility Pub Date : 1987-08-01
K R Daniels
{"title":"Semen donors in New Zealand: their characteristics and attitudes.","authors":"K R Daniels","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The characteristics and attitudes of 37 semen donors in six New Zealand AID programmes are reported. Donors were found to be highly educated and, as a result, in predominantly professional and technical fields. The major reason for being a donor was altruism--a desire to help infertile couples, although financial considerations were a factor for almost one-quarter of the respondents. The attitude of donors towards payment differs markedly from the attitudes of specialists providing AID services. Personal knowledge of infertile couples was found to be a factor leading one-quarter of the donors to offer their services. There is a wide variation in the number of times that some donors are asked to donate, with some specialists operating outside the guidelines produced by the Royal New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Donors are almost equally divided on the issue of the child's right to know of the nature of her/his conception. Almost one-quarter of donors would still donate if there was a possibility that they could be traced in the future and a further 30% were unsure. These findings challenge some of the traditionally accepted views about the need for donor anonymity. It was found that 39% of donors expressed an interest in knowing the outcome of their donations. The results of the study have implications for policy and practice issues associated with the psychosocial aspects of AID. One implication is that it seems important that the psychosocial needs of donors be considered and that programmes should be flexible in responding to the differing attitudes, expectations, and needs of donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10478,"journal":{"name":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","volume":"5 4","pages":"177-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The characteristics and attitudes of 37 semen donors in six New Zealand AID programmes are reported. Donors were found to be highly educated and, as a result, in predominantly professional and technical fields. The major reason for being a donor was altruism--a desire to help infertile couples, although financial considerations were a factor for almost one-quarter of the respondents. The attitude of donors towards payment differs markedly from the attitudes of specialists providing AID services. Personal knowledge of infertile couples was found to be a factor leading one-quarter of the donors to offer their services. There is a wide variation in the number of times that some donors are asked to donate, with some specialists operating outside the guidelines produced by the Royal New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Donors are almost equally divided on the issue of the child's right to know of the nature of her/his conception. Almost one-quarter of donors would still donate if there was a possibility that they could be traced in the future and a further 30% were unsure. These findings challenge some of the traditionally accepted views about the need for donor anonymity. It was found that 39% of donors expressed an interest in knowing the outcome of their donations. The results of the study have implications for policy and practice issues associated with the psychosocial aspects of AID. One implication is that it seems important that the psychosocial needs of donors be considered and that programmes should be flexible in responding to the differing attitudes, expectations, and needs of donors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰的捐精者:他们的特点和态度。
报告了新西兰6个艾滋病方案中37名精液捐献者的特点和态度。捐助者都受过高等教育,因此主要从事专业和技术领域的工作。捐精的主要原因是利他主义——希望帮助不孕夫妇,尽管近四分之一的受访者出于经济考虑。捐助者对付款的态度与提供援助服务的专家的态度明显不同。研究发现,对不孕夫妇的个人了解是导致四分之一的捐赠者提供服务的一个因素。一些捐赠者被要求捐赠的次数差别很大,一些专家的操作不符合新西兰皇家妇产科学院制定的指导方针。捐助者在儿童是否有权知道她/他的受孕性质的问题上几乎平分秋水。近四分之一的捐赠者如果有可能在未来被追踪到,他们仍然会捐赠,另有30%的人不确定。这些发现挑战了一些传统上接受的关于捐赠者匿名必要性的观点。研究发现,39%的捐赠者表示有兴趣了解他们捐赠的结果。这项研究的结果对与艾滋病的社会心理方面有关的政策和实践问题具有影响。其中一个含义是,似乎重要的是要考虑到捐助者的社会心理需要,而且方案应灵活应对捐助者的不同态度、期望和需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Launch of New Journal - An Announcement A comparison of the transabdominal and transvaginal methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes for in vitro fertilisation. Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome. Oral contraceptive-induced changes in plasma lipids: do they have any clinical relevance? Sperm auto-immunity associated with vasectomy, vasovasostomy and epididymovasostomy in Korean males.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1