{"title":"Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures.","authors":"L F Elfner, W R Howse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A rotating boom positioned a loudspeaker at ear height at a distance of 4 ft from the center of the head of S, who was seated in a darkened large anechoic chamber (684 ft); 750-msec bursts of pink noise, separated by 3.25 sec, at 54 db SPL, were presented. During the interstimulus interval the speaker was moved cw or ccw in the presence of a masking noise at 73 db SPL. Practiced young adults (2F, 1 M) judged azimuth \"same\" or \"different\"; minimum discriminable angle (MDA) was taken as P(c) = .70, corrected for false alarms (judgments \"s\" or \"d\" with no movement). Standard azimuths relative to S were at the 8 cardinal points. MDAs were best at 0 degree (c. 4.5 degrees) but were still relatively good (c. 8.5 degrees) at 180 degrees. In general, MDAs were poorer in the rear quadrants. One S excelled at MDA and exhibited the lowest false alarm rate. The effect of the masker, and random selection of standard and azimuth and of comparison stimuli at every trial, help explain the rather large MDAs compared with the minimum audible angles in the literature. The rather large determination at 90 degrees azimuth as determined by Mills (1958) was not found in these data.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"27 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A rotating boom positioned a loudspeaker at ear height at a distance of 4 ft from the center of the head of S, who was seated in a darkened large anechoic chamber (684 ft); 750-msec bursts of pink noise, separated by 3.25 sec, at 54 db SPL, were presented. During the interstimulus interval the speaker was moved cw or ccw in the presence of a masking noise at 73 db SPL. Practiced young adults (2F, 1 M) judged azimuth "same" or "different"; minimum discriminable angle (MDA) was taken as P(c) = .70, corrected for false alarms (judgments "s" or "d" with no movement). Standard azimuths relative to S were at the 8 cardinal points. MDAs were best at 0 degree (c. 4.5 degrees) but were still relatively good (c. 8.5 degrees) at 180 degrees. In general, MDAs were poorer in the rear quadrants. One S excelled at MDA and exhibited the lowest false alarm rate. The effect of the masker, and random selection of standard and azimuth and of comparison stimuli at every trial, help explain the rather large MDAs compared with the minimum audible angles in the literature. The rather large determination at 90 degrees azimuth as determined by Mills (1958) was not found in these data.
S坐在一个黑暗的大消声室里(684英尺),一个旋转吊杆将一个扬声器放置在离头部中心4英尺的耳朵高度;在54 db SPL下,出现了750毫秒的粉红噪声爆发,间隔3.25秒。在刺激间隔期间,说话者在73 db SPL的掩蔽噪声的存在下连续或连续移动。练习过的青壮年(2岁、1岁)判断方位角“相同”或“不同”;最小可分辨角(MDA)取P(c) = 0.70,对假警报(判断为“s”或“d”而没有运动)进行校正。相对于S的标准方位角在8个基点上。MDAs在0°(c. 4.5°)时效果最好,但在180°(c. 8.5°)时效果相对较好。总的来说,后象限的MDAs较差。一个S在MDA方面表现优异,虚报率最低。掩蔽器的作用,以及在每次试验中随机选择标准和方位角以及比较刺激,有助于解释与文献中最小可听角相比,相当大的mda。在这些数据中没有发现Mills(1958)所确定的90度方位角的相当大的决定。