Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1986-01-01
P C Pandey, H Kunov, S M Abel
{"title":"Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.","authors":"P C Pandey,&nbsp;H Kunov,&nbsp;S M Abel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of auditory signal delay on audio-visual perception of videotaped sentence lists by Ss with normal hearing was measured. The test material consisted of sentences read by a man, with or without a picture representing as context one of the key words in each sentence. In Exper. I, 12 Ss (6M, 6F), inexperienced with lipreading, were presented test material in the audio-only (A), visual-only (V) and audio-visual (AV) modes. Speech signals were presented at 0 or -10 db S/N re a multitalker babble fixed at 60 dbA. The audio signal was delayed (re visual signal) in 6 steps from 0-300 msec. Exper. II repeated Exper. I with 6 Ss (2M, 4F) familiar with lipreading; the speech signal was presented at -5 db S/N and 4 audio delays from 0-240 msec. While these Ss performed better in the V mode than those in Exper. I, the main effects of context and delays were similar. The disruptive effect of the audio delay on speech perception with lipreading (AV mode) was a function of S/N, being relatively more disruptive at the worse S/N, but it was not significant for delays up to a range of 80-120 msec. The results are in agreement with the theory (McGrath and Summerfield, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1985, 77, 678-685) that sensitivity to audio-visual desynchrony is significant only at a syllabic level in connected speech. The results further imply that moderate delays of up to 80 msec introduced by speech-processing aids for lipreading, as for cochlear-implanted patients, will not interfere with the advantages of providing the auditory information.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 1","pages":"27-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of auditory signal delay on audio-visual perception of videotaped sentence lists by Ss with normal hearing was measured. The test material consisted of sentences read by a man, with or without a picture representing as context one of the key words in each sentence. In Exper. I, 12 Ss (6M, 6F), inexperienced with lipreading, were presented test material in the audio-only (A), visual-only (V) and audio-visual (AV) modes. Speech signals were presented at 0 or -10 db S/N re a multitalker babble fixed at 60 dbA. The audio signal was delayed (re visual signal) in 6 steps from 0-300 msec. Exper. II repeated Exper. I with 6 Ss (2M, 4F) familiar with lipreading; the speech signal was presented at -5 db S/N and 4 audio delays from 0-240 msec. While these Ss performed better in the V mode than those in Exper. I, the main effects of context and delays were similar. The disruptive effect of the audio delay on speech perception with lipreading (AV mode) was a function of S/N, being relatively more disruptive at the worse S/N, but it was not significant for delays up to a range of 80-120 msec. The results are in agreement with the theory (McGrath and Summerfield, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1985, 77, 678-685) that sensitivity to audio-visual desynchrony is significant only at a syllabic level in connected speech. The results further imply that moderate delays of up to 80 msec introduced by speech-processing aids for lipreading, as for cochlear-implanted patients, will not interfere with the advantages of providing the auditory information.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听觉信号延迟对唇读语音感知的破坏性影响。
测量了听觉信号延迟对正常听力学生对录像句子表的视听知觉的影响。测试材料由一名男子朗读的句子组成,每个句子中有或没有图片代表一个关键词的上下文。其实。没有唇读经验的I、12名学生(6M、6F)以纯音频(A)、纯视觉(V)和视听(AV)模式呈现测试材料。语音信号以0或-10 db的信噪比在固定为60 dbA的多话音系统中呈现。音频信号(视觉信号)从0-300毫秒分6步延迟。擅长。我重复了一遍。6分(2M, 4F),熟悉唇读;语音信号以-5 db信噪比和4个0-240 msec的音频延迟呈现。而这些Ss在V模式下的表现要优于exp模式。情境和延迟的主要影响是相似的。音频延迟对唇读(AV模式)语音感知的破坏性影响是信噪比的函数,在较差的信噪比下,破坏性相对更大,但在80-120 msec范围内,这种影响并不显著。结果与理论一致(McGrath and Summerfield, J. Acoust。Soc。点。[j], 1985, 77, 678-685),对视听不同步的敏感性仅在连接语音的音节水平上是显著的。研究结果进一步表明,对于人工耳蜗植入患者来说,语音处理辅助设备为唇读带来的最长80毫秒的中度延迟不会干扰提供听觉信息的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fabrication of a new headset for air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. Speech reception thresholds for digits. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1