Test of auditory comprehension: a comparison of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1986-07-01
J R Brown
{"title":"Test of auditory comprehension: a comparison of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.","authors":"J R Brown","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Normal-hearing (NH) children (N:35) aged 9-11 yrs in regular classrooms were given all 10 subtests of the Test of Auditory Comprehension (TAC) (Trammel, 1976). Group means of raw scores, measures of dispersion, and of internal consistency, alpha, and of test-retest reliability, r, were computed and are presented here for the first time for NH Ss. These data were compared with TAC norms published for a group of 750 hearing-impaired (HI) children with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Group means for the NH Ss were substantially higher (p less than or equal to .05) on 9 of the 10 subtests than for the HI Ss, but the dispersion was always substantially greater. Furthermore, estimates of alpha and of r were greater on 8 of the 10 subtests for alpha and on 8 for r, the 8 tests not altogether overlapping. The implication is that different auditory processing information may be used by the two different populations, generally supporting the use in the clinic of only those tests specifically designed and demonstrated to be applicable for specific populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"26 3","pages":"177-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normal-hearing (NH) children (N:35) aged 9-11 yrs in regular classrooms were given all 10 subtests of the Test of Auditory Comprehension (TAC) (Trammel, 1976). Group means of raw scores, measures of dispersion, and of internal consistency, alpha, and of test-retest reliability, r, were computed and are presented here for the first time for NH Ss. These data were compared with TAC norms published for a group of 750 hearing-impaired (HI) children with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Group means for the NH Ss were substantially higher (p less than or equal to .05) on 9 of the 10 subtests than for the HI Ss, but the dispersion was always substantially greater. Furthermore, estimates of alpha and of r were greater on 8 of the 10 subtests for alpha and on 8 for r, the 8 tests not altogether overlapping. The implication is that different auditory processing information may be used by the two different populations, generally supporting the use in the clinic of only those tests specifically designed and demonstrated to be applicable for specific populations.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力理解测验:听力受损者与正常听者的比较。
对9 ~ 11岁正常听力儿童(35岁)进行了听力理解测验(TAC)的全部10项测试(Trammel, 1976)。计算了NH Ss的原始得分、离散度、内部一致性、alpha和重测信度r的组均值,并首次在这里给出了这些数据。这些数据与750名中度至重度感音神经性听力损失的听障(HI)儿童的TAC标准进行了比较。在10个亚检验中,NH组的组均值有9个显著高于HI组(p <或等于0.05),但离散度总是显著大于HI组。此外,alpha和r的估计值在alpha的10个子测试中的8个子测试和r的8个子测试中都较大,这8个测试并不完全重叠。这意味着两种不同的人群可能使用不同的听觉处理信息,通常支持在临床中只使用那些专门设计并证明适用于特定人群的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fabrication of a new headset for air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. Speech reception thresholds for digits. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1