Female sterilization: can the woman who will seek reversal be identified prospectively?

Abstract

Demographic socio-economic and decision-making aspects of sterilization and reversal of sterilization were compared in a group of 103 women requesting reversal (RR) and 117 women about to undergo sterilization (S), to determine the practicality of identifying in advance the woman likely to request reversal. The willingness of patients to pay for these procedures and the ethical implications of these decisions were also examined. RR were younger at the first relationship, birth of first child and birth of last child. There were no differences (RR vs S) between the number of full-term pregnancies, living children and therapeutic abortions. The timing of sterilization (puerperal versus interval) did not influence the decision to be reversed. The level of education, partner's level of education and mean family income were lower in the group requesting reversal. Multiple regression analysis revealed three characteristics which were most discriminatory: youth at first birth; lack of spousal support; and failure to choose 'family complete' as a reason for sterilization. The predictability was not strong enough to provide an accurate assessment of the individual woman. RR were of significantly lower socio-economic standing but were more likely to be prepared to pay a large sum of money for the reversal. The ethical implications of this finding are discussed.