Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1985-07-01
E M Weiler, F Cobb, D Sandman, L Pederson
{"title":"Monaural and binaural adaptation in sequence: SDLB analogue?","authors":"E M Weiler,&nbsp;F Cobb,&nbsp;D Sandman,&nbsp;L Pederson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnitude estimates (M.E.) of loudness of a 1-kc/s tone in the R ear at 60 db SPL were required over three 3-phase sessions from 15 normal-hearing young adults. The initial tone in the session was arbitrarily assigned a value of \"60 units\" in instructions to the S. The session was arranged to be analogous to that commonly used in Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balancing (SDLB). In a baseline Phase I in any of 3 sessions both ears received identical, simultaneous, intermittent stimulation. In each session, one of 3 duty cycles (randomized) were used (all on-times of .5 sec, off-times of .5, 4.5, or 24.5 sec). An M.E. judgment was requested every 10 sec for just over 1 min. Then immediately in Phase II the L ear received nothing while the R ear received continuous stimulation at 60 db SPL for 7 min, with M.E. Judgements requested every 10 sec during Min 1 and every min thereafter. Then in Phase III the R ear continued to receive continuous stimulation at 60 db SPL for 1 min while in the contralateral ear the condition of Phase I was re-introduced. M.E. loudness judgements for the R ear were requested as in Phase I. During Phase I there was, as expected, no loudness adaptation. During the adapting Phase II, M.E. group values declined progressively and significantly, but without significant differences among duty cycles. M.E. values in Phase III continued to decline significantly even though the contralateral ear was being given intermittent stimulation (irrespective of duty cycle). Previous studies had found that, for most listeners, M.E. loudness adaptation does not occur when the continuous stimulation is presented by itself. As far as is known, the present study is the first M.E. loudness adaptation study to present binaural intermittent stimulation before the continuous monaural stimulus. It is suggested that the redundancy of the continuous monaural stimulation, in comparison with the similar intermittent stimulus, is associated with the diminution of loudness.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"25 3","pages":"149-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnitude estimates (M.E.) of loudness of a 1-kc/s tone in the R ear at 60 db SPL were required over three 3-phase sessions from 15 normal-hearing young adults. The initial tone in the session was arbitrarily assigned a value of "60 units" in instructions to the S. The session was arranged to be analogous to that commonly used in Simultaneous Dichotic Loudness Balancing (SDLB). In a baseline Phase I in any of 3 sessions both ears received identical, simultaneous, intermittent stimulation. In each session, one of 3 duty cycles (randomized) were used (all on-times of .5 sec, off-times of .5, 4.5, or 24.5 sec). An M.E. judgment was requested every 10 sec for just over 1 min. Then immediately in Phase II the L ear received nothing while the R ear received continuous stimulation at 60 db SPL for 7 min, with M.E. Judgements requested every 10 sec during Min 1 and every min thereafter. Then in Phase III the R ear continued to receive continuous stimulation at 60 db SPL for 1 min while in the contralateral ear the condition of Phase I was re-introduced. M.E. loudness judgements for the R ear were requested as in Phase I. During Phase I there was, as expected, no loudness adaptation. During the adapting Phase II, M.E. group values declined progressively and significantly, but without significant differences among duty cycles. M.E. values in Phase III continued to decline significantly even though the contralateral ear was being given intermittent stimulation (irrespective of duty cycle). Previous studies had found that, for most listeners, M.E. loudness adaptation does not occur when the continuous stimulation is presented by itself. As far as is known, the present study is the first M.E. loudness adaptation study to present binaural intermittent stimulation before the continuous monaural stimulus. It is suggested that the redundancy of the continuous monaural stimulation, in comparison with the similar intermittent stimulus, is associated with the diminution of loudness.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单耳和双耳适应顺序:SDLB模拟物?
对15名听力正常的年轻人在60分贝声压级下,进行三次三阶段的R耳1 kc/s音调响度的幅度估计(M.E.)。会话中的初始音调在s指令中被任意指定为“60个单位”的值。会话的安排类似于同时二分响度平衡(SDLB)中常用的设置。在基线阶段1的3个疗程中的任何一个,双耳接受相同的,同时的,间歇的刺激。在每个会话中,使用3个占空比(随机)中的一个(所有开启时间为0.5秒,关闭时间为0.5、4.5或24.5秒)。在1分钟多一点的时间里,每10秒进行一次M.E.判断。然后在第二阶段,L耳没有接受任何刺激,而R耳接受60分贝声压级的连续刺激,持续7分钟,在min 1期间每10秒进行一次M.E.判断,之后每分钟进行一次。然后在第三阶段,右耳继续接受60 db SPL的连续刺激1分钟,而在对侧耳再次引入第一阶段的条件。与第一阶段一样,要求对R耳进行M.E.响度判断。在第一阶段,正如预期的那样,没有响度适应。在适应阶段II, M.E.组值逐渐显著下降,但各占空比之间无显著差异。即使对侧耳进行间歇性刺激(无论占空比如何),III期的M.E.值仍继续显著下降。先前的研究发现,对于大多数听众来说,当连续的刺激本身出现时,M.E.响度适应不会发生。据目前所知,本研究是首次在双耳间歇刺激之前进行双耳连续刺激的M.E.响度适应研究。这表明,与类似的间歇刺激相比,连续单耳刺激的冗余与响度的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fabrication of a new headset for air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. Speech reception thresholds for digits. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1