A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Clinical reproduction and fertility Pub Date : 1985-03-01
N D Goldstuck, M L Matthews
{"title":"A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.","authors":"N D Goldstuck,&nbsp;M L Matthews","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expected, immediate, and three-minute pain response following IUCD insertion was evaluated in 84 nulliparous women undergoing a first IUCD insertion. Expected pain was significantly higher than immediate pain and both were significantly higher than three-minute pain. Immediate pain following IUCD insertion was positively related to expected pain but the relationship was not strong enough to be of clinical value. The pain was significantly related to the degree of cervical resistance and this relationship was made much more obvious by the use of the expected pain parameter which is a valuable additional clinical measurement in pain research. IUCD insertion pain consists of a short cervical (less than 3 minutes) and longer fundal component. Avoiding excessive uterine manipulation during device insertion results in lower immediate and later pain response scores for a given device when comparisons are made with other studies, where standard techniques were used.</p>","PeriodicalId":10478,"journal":{"name":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","volume":"3 1","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expected, immediate, and three-minute pain response following IUCD insertion was evaluated in 84 nulliparous women undergoing a first IUCD insertion. Expected pain was significantly higher than immediate pain and both were significantly higher than three-minute pain. Immediate pain following IUCD insertion was positively related to expected pain but the relationship was not strong enough to be of clinical value. The pain was significantly related to the degree of cervical resistance and this relationship was made much more obvious by the use of the expected pain parameter which is a valuable additional clinical measurement in pain research. IUCD insertion pain consists of a short cervical (less than 3 minutes) and longer fundal component. Avoiding excessive uterine manipulation during device insertion results in lower immediate and later pain response scores for a given device when comparisons are made with other studies, where standard techniques were used.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
插入宫内节育器后实际和预期疼痛反应的比较。
对84例首次植入IUCD的未生育妇女进行了预期的、即刻的和3分钟的疼痛反应评估。预期疼痛明显高于即时疼痛,两者都明显高于三分钟疼痛。宫内节育器置入后即刻疼痛与预期疼痛呈正相关,但相关性不够强,不足以具有临床价值。疼痛程度与颈椎阻力程度显著相关,这种关系通过使用预期疼痛参数变得更加明显,预期疼痛参数是疼痛研究中有价值的附加临床测量。宫内节育器插入痛包括较短的宫颈痛(少于3分钟)和较长的基底痛。当与其他使用标准技术的研究进行比较时,在插入装置时避免过度的子宫操作会导致给定装置的即时和后期疼痛反应评分较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Launch of New Journal - An Announcement A comparison of the transabdominal and transvaginal methods of ultrasound-guided aspiration of pre-ovulatory oocytes for in vitro fertilisation. Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome. Oral contraceptive-induced changes in plasma lipids: do they have any clinical relevance? Sperm auto-immunity associated with vasectomy, vasovasostomy and epididymovasostomy in Korean males.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1