Submaximal endurance performance related to the ventilation thresholds.

T M McLellan, J S Skinner
{"title":"Submaximal endurance performance related to the ventilation thresholds.","authors":"T M McLellan,&nbsp;J S Skinner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken to compare the variance in time to fatigue (TF) at intensities expressed relative to VO2max, ventilation threshold 1 (VT1) or 2 (VT2). Two 3-min, 30 Watt incremental tests on the cycle ergometer were used to determine VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1), VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max) and VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max) for 16 subjects. At weekly intervals, subjects worked to volitional fatigue at 3 randomly-ordered power outputs that represented 73.1 +/- 2.8, 85.4 +/- 2.8 and 95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max. A significant quadratic interaction was observed for TF values between VO2max and intensity, suggesting a different magnitude of response related to VO2max. Subject data were then grouped according to VO2max into a low (N = 5, 40-44 ml X kg-1 X min-1), medium (N = 5, 48-52 ml X kg-1 X min-1) or high (N = 6, 56-61 ml X kg-1 X min-1) category. For all groups, a decaying exponential function best described the relationship between TF and intensity. The method of expressing intensity appeared to have only a small effect on the proportion of variance explained by this logarithmic relationship (0.85 less than or equal to r2 less than or equal to 0.93). In contrast, however, a 30% reduction in the standard error of estimate for TF was observed when intensity was expressed relative to both ventilation thresholds as compared to the traditional expression of intensity relative to VO2max.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":75669,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","volume":"10 2","pages":"81-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the variance in time to fatigue (TF) at intensities expressed relative to VO2max, ventilation threshold 1 (VT1) or 2 (VT2). Two 3-min, 30 Watt incremental tests on the cycle ergometer were used to determine VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1), VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max) and VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max) for 16 subjects. At weekly intervals, subjects worked to volitional fatigue at 3 randomly-ordered power outputs that represented 73.1 +/- 2.8, 85.4 +/- 2.8 and 95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max. A significant quadratic interaction was observed for TF values between VO2max and intensity, suggesting a different magnitude of response related to VO2max. Subject data were then grouped according to VO2max into a low (N = 5, 40-44 ml X kg-1 X min-1), medium (N = 5, 48-52 ml X kg-1 X min-1) or high (N = 6, 56-61 ml X kg-1 X min-1) category. For all groups, a decaying exponential function best described the relationship between TF and intensity. The method of expressing intensity appeared to have only a small effect on the proportion of variance explained by this logarithmic relationship (0.85 less than or equal to r2 less than or equal to 0.93). In contrast, however, a 30% reduction in the standard error of estimate for TF was observed when intensity was expressed relative to both ventilation thresholds as compared to the traditional expression of intensity relative to VO2max.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚最大耐力表现与通风阈值有关。
本研究旨在比较相对于VO2max、通气阈值1 (VT1)或2 (VT2)的强度下疲劳时间(TF)的方差。在循环测力仪上进行2次3分钟、30瓦特的增量试验,测定16例受试者的VO2max (50.7 +/- 7.2 ml X kg-1 X min-1)、VT1 (51.7 +/- 3.7% VO2max)和VT2 (79.0 +/- 3.7% VO2max)。每隔一周,受试者在代表73.1 +/- 2.8、85.4 +/- 2.8和95.0 +/- 3.4% VO2max的3种随机顺序功率输出下工作至意志疲劳。最大摄氧量和强度之间的TF值存在显著的二次交互作用,表明与最大摄氧量相关的响应幅度不同。然后根据VO2max将受试者数据分为低(N = 5,40 -44 ml X kg-1 X min-1)、中(N = 5,48 -52 ml X kg-1 X min-1)和高(N = 6,56 -61 ml X kg-1 X min-1)组。对于所有组,衰减指数函数最好地描述了TF与强度之间的关系。表达强度的方法似乎对这种对数关系解释的方差比例只有很小的影响(0.85小于等于r2小于等于0.93)。然而,与传统的相对于VO2max的强度表达相比,当强度相对于两个通风阈值表示时,观察到TF估计的标准误差降低了30%。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STEROACUITY IN MONOCULARLY INDUCED ASTIMATISM IN EMMETROPES AND AMMETROPES: A COMPARATIVE CROSSSECTIONAL STUDY EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PHARMACOTHERAPY OF ROTAVIRUS AND IMPACT OF VACCINATION TO PREVENTION ITS MORTALITY PREDICTORS OF LATE PRESENTATION OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: A MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR HEALTH SYSTEMS IN PAKISTAN EFFECTIVENESS OF TRADITIONAL TEACHING AUGMENTED WITH INTERACTIVE SESSIONS AS A NEW APPROACH IN BIOCHEMISTRY TEACHING TRANSMISSION OF SARS-CoV-2 CAN BE CONTROLLED BY ADOPTING STANDARD SAFETY PROCEDURES AND USING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1