Assessment of a revised course in surgery.

M D Buckley-Sharp, K Shenderey, M Hobsley, R Marcusson
{"title":"Assessment of a revised course in surgery.","authors":"M D Buckley-Sharp, K Shenderey, M Hobsley, R Marcusson","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2923.1971.tb02148.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the system that existed at the Middlesex Hospital Medical School before June 1969, a clinical introductory course was followed by two medical firms, each of three months, and these in turn were followed by two surgical firms each of three months. It is not the purpose of this paper to comment on or discuss this particular arrangement of the clinical course, but merely to note that students formed themselves into groups and requested assignment to the teachers of their choice. This request procedure was repeated every three months for each new firm, the students requesting one of the eight medical firms, or one of the six surgical firms, depending on the stage reached in their clinical course. There were a number of disadvantages inherent in this system. Firstly, four of the medical, and four of the surgical firms were located at the Middlesex Hospital, and four of the medical and two of the surgical firms were located at the Central Middlesex Hospital. Students are expected, where possible, to gain experience at both hospitals. Secondly, there was unwritten agreement as to which teachers provided similar types of clinical material, and students naturally expected to be provided with the greatest possible variety. On occasions, however, administrative difficulty was encountered in maintaining this framework within the requests made by the students. Starting in June 1969, the system for surgical firms was revised to a cyclic one. Two streams,","PeriodicalId":75619,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medical education","volume":"5 1","pages":"34-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1971.tb02148.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1971.tb02148.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Under the system that existed at the Middlesex Hospital Medical School before June 1969, a clinical introductory course was followed by two medical firms, each of three months, and these in turn were followed by two surgical firms each of three months. It is not the purpose of this paper to comment on or discuss this particular arrangement of the clinical course, but merely to note that students formed themselves into groups and requested assignment to the teachers of their choice. This request procedure was repeated every three months for each new firm, the students requesting one of the eight medical firms, or one of the six surgical firms, depending on the stage reached in their clinical course. There were a number of disadvantages inherent in this system. Firstly, four of the medical, and four of the surgical firms were located at the Middlesex Hospital, and four of the medical and two of the surgical firms were located at the Central Middlesex Hospital. Students are expected, where possible, to gain experience at both hospitals. Secondly, there was unwritten agreement as to which teachers provided similar types of clinical material, and students naturally expected to be provided with the greatest possible variety. On occasions, however, administrative difficulty was encountered in maintaining this framework within the requests made by the students. Starting in June 1969, the system for surgical firms was revised to a cyclic one. Two streams,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订后的外科课程评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Education in occupational medicine. The retiring editor: Dr John Ellis. Recall and retrieval of anatomical knowledge. Editorial: The pursuit of quality. Textbooks -- a new approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1