[In vitro study of strains of Staphylococcus: choice of an antibiotic].

J C Messmer, E Lecaillon-Thibon, H Soler
{"title":"[In vitro study of strains of Staphylococcus: choice of an antibiotic].","authors":"J C Messmer,&nbsp;E Lecaillon-Thibon,&nbsp;H Soler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to determine the best antibiotic in presumptive staphylococcal infection and/or bacteriologically established staphylococcal infection before results of antibiotic sensitivity tests are available. 382 strains were analyzed. Only sensitivity or resistance to antibiotics were considered. Vancomycin is the best antistaphylococcal agent (3% resistance rate on the 382 strains), (11% resistance rate on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains). Pristinamycin and Virginiamycin also yield excellent scores but are less efficient against Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (21%). Cefalotin is still an excellent antistaphylococcal agent (7%). Fosfomycin is especially valuable against polyresistant staphylococci, with a 26% resistance rate on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lastly, significant increases in resistance rates relative to 1966 staphylococci strains are found only for penicillin (68% versus 78%) and rifamycin (3.6% versus 8%).</p>","PeriodicalId":18005,"journal":{"name":"La semaine des hopitaux : organe fonde par l'Association d'enseignement medical des hopitaux de Paris","volume":"60 19","pages":"1329-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La semaine des hopitaux : organe fonde par l'Association d'enseignement medical des hopitaux de Paris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the best antibiotic in presumptive staphylococcal infection and/or bacteriologically established staphylococcal infection before results of antibiotic sensitivity tests are available. 382 strains were analyzed. Only sensitivity or resistance to antibiotics were considered. Vancomycin is the best antistaphylococcal agent (3% resistance rate on the 382 strains), (11% resistance rate on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains). Pristinamycin and Virginiamycin also yield excellent scores but are less efficient against Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (21%). Cefalotin is still an excellent antistaphylococcal agent (7%). Fosfomycin is especially valuable against polyresistant staphylococci, with a 26% resistance rate on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lastly, significant increases in resistance rates relative to 1966 staphylococci strains are found only for penicillin (68% versus 78%) and rifamycin (3.6% versus 8%).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[葡萄球菌的体外研究:抗生素的选择]。
本研究的目的是在获得抗生素敏感性试验结果之前,确定对假定的葡萄球菌感染和/或细菌学上确定的葡萄球菌感染的最佳抗生素。分析了382株菌株。仅考虑对抗生素的敏感性或耐药性。万古霉素是最好的抗葡萄球菌药物(382株耐药率为3%)(耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌耐药率为11%)。普司他霉素和维吉尼亚霉素也获得了优异的分数,但对耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌的效率较低(21%)。头孢菌素仍然是一种优秀的抗葡萄球菌药物(7%)。磷霉素对多耐药葡萄球菌特别有价值,对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的耐药率为26%。最后,与1966年葡萄球菌菌株相比,仅发现青霉素(68%对78%)和利福霉素(3.6%对8%)的耐药率显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Follicular dysplasia]. [Mitral stenosis]. [Systemic periarteritis nodosa associated with monoclonal gammapathy. 4 cases]. [Osteoradionecrosis in adults]. [In vitro study of strains of Staphylococcus: choice of an antibiotic].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1