The effect of nitrification inhibitors on the aerobic biodegradation of tetracycline antibiotics in swine wastewater

IF 8.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Chemosphere Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136849
Linyan Yang , Cheng Yuan , Xueming Chen , Weibo Xue , Guomin Cao , Shujuan Meng , Lichun Bai
{"title":"The effect of nitrification inhibitors on the aerobic biodegradation of tetracycline antibiotics in swine wastewater","authors":"Linyan Yang ,&nbsp;Cheng Yuan ,&nbsp;Xueming Chen ,&nbsp;Weibo Xue ,&nbsp;Guomin Cao ,&nbsp;Shujuan Meng ,&nbsp;Lichun Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aerobic biotreatment process for the dual goals of antibiotic removal and ammonia retainment for the field-return-based treatment of swine wastewater was optimized by adding 2-chloro-6-trichloromethylpyridine (TCMP), commonly used as a nitrogen fertilizer synergist. The results show that the dosage of 5–10 mg/L TCMP daily effectively inhibited nitrification. The COD and tetracycline<span> antibiotics (TCs) in the absence of TCMP was removed by 91% and 76%, and became 87% and 78% with 5 mg/L TCMP and 83% and 70% with 10 mg/L TCMP, respectively. The removal efficiency of four TCs generally followed a decreasing trend of chlortetracycline (CTC) &gt; doxycycline (DC) &gt; tetracycline (TC) &gt; oxytetracycline (OTC). A dosage of 5 mg/L TCMP daily inhibited ammonia nitrification effectively and only slightly affected the removal of conventional organic pollutants and TCs. The contribution of volatilization and hydrolysis to the removal of TCs was negligible. The overall removal efficiency of four TCs in removal pathway experiments was 98%, 94%, 97%, and 96% for OTC, CTC, DC, and TC, of which 69%, 41%, 56%, and 62% was contributed by absorption, and 29%, 53%, 41%, and 34% was contributed by biodegradation, respectively. This study may have significant implications for the proper management of livestock wastewater intended to be used as fertilizers, which aims to reduce the exposure risk of antibiotics and preserve its nutrient value.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":276,"journal":{"name":"Chemosphere","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 136849"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045653522033422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aerobic biotreatment process for the dual goals of antibiotic removal and ammonia retainment for the field-return-based treatment of swine wastewater was optimized by adding 2-chloro-6-trichloromethylpyridine (TCMP), commonly used as a nitrogen fertilizer synergist. The results show that the dosage of 5–10 mg/L TCMP daily effectively inhibited nitrification. The COD and tetracycline antibiotics (TCs) in the absence of TCMP was removed by 91% and 76%, and became 87% and 78% with 5 mg/L TCMP and 83% and 70% with 10 mg/L TCMP, respectively. The removal efficiency of four TCs generally followed a decreasing trend of chlortetracycline (CTC) > doxycycline (DC) > tetracycline (TC) > oxytetracycline (OTC). A dosage of 5 mg/L TCMP daily inhibited ammonia nitrification effectively and only slightly affected the removal of conventional organic pollutants and TCs. The contribution of volatilization and hydrolysis to the removal of TCs was negligible. The overall removal efficiency of four TCs in removal pathway experiments was 98%, 94%, 97%, and 96% for OTC, CTC, DC, and TC, of which 69%, 41%, 56%, and 62% was contributed by absorption, and 29%, 53%, 41%, and 34% was contributed by biodegradation, respectively. This study may have significant implications for the proper management of livestock wastewater intended to be used as fertilizers, which aims to reduce the exposure risk of antibiotics and preserve its nutrient value.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硝化抑制剂对猪废水中四环素类抗生素好氧生物降解的影响
通过添加常用的氮肥增效剂2-氯-6-三氯甲基吡啶(TCMP),优化了猪场还田处理废水中抗生素去除和氨保留双重目标的好氧生物处理工艺。结果表明,每天5 ~ 10 mg/L的剂量能有效抑制硝化作用。不添加中药时,COD和四环素类抗生素去除率分别为91%和76%,添加5 mg/L中药时去除率分别为87%和78%,添加10 mg/L中药时去除率分别为83%和70%。4种TCs的去除率总体上呈下降趋势;强力霉素(DC) >四环素(TC);土霉素(OTC)。5 mg/L / d的剂量能有效抑制氨硝化,对常规有机污染物和TCs的去除影响较小。挥发和水解对TCs去除的贡献可以忽略不计。在去除途径实验中,四种TC对OTC、CTC、DC和TC的总体去除率分别为98%、94%、97%和96%,其中吸收贡献率分别为69%、41%、56%和62%,生物降解贡献率分别为29%、53%、41%和34%。本研究可能对畜禽废水的合理管理具有重要意义,旨在降低抗生素的暴露风险并保持其营养价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemosphere
Chemosphere 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
4975
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Chemosphere, being an international multidisciplinary journal, is dedicated to publishing original communications and review articles on chemicals in the environment. The scope covers a wide range of topics, including the identification, quantification, behavior, fate, toxicology, treatment, and remediation of chemicals in the bio-, hydro-, litho-, and atmosphere, ensuring the broad dissemination of research in this field.
期刊最新文献
Integration of Fe-MOF-laccase-magnetic biochar: From Rational Designing of a biocatalyst to aflatoxin B1 decontamination of peanut oil Evaluation of extraction and storage conditions for quantification and characterization of silver nanoparticles in complex samples by single particle-ICP-MS Neurotoxicology of warfare arsenical, diphenylarsinic acid in humans and experimental models Role of molybdenum compounds in enhancing denitrification: Structure-activity relationship and the regulatory mechanisms Percutaneous absorption of two bisphenol a analogues, BPAF and TGSA: Novel In vitro data from human skin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1