Diagnosing borderline. A contribution to the question of its conceptual validity.

J Modestin, I Abrecht, W Tschaggelar, H Hoffmann
{"title":"Diagnosing borderline. A contribution to the question of its conceptual validity.","authors":"J Modestin,&nbsp;I Abrecht,&nbsp;W Tschaggelar,&nbsp;H Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/BF00346086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 437 acute psychiatric inpatients were investigated with the help of a questionnaire containing DSM-III diagnostic criteria for schizotypal as well as for borderline personality disorder and criteria of the Flexible System for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. All patients were also independently diagnosed according to the ICD-9. The clinical ICD-9 diagnoses were compared with the diagnoses given on the basis of the three operational criteria sets mentioned. Patients fulfilling the operational criteria for schizotypal personality disorder were clinically diagnosed as mostly schizophrenic, and there was also a considerable overlap between the two groups of patients, those fulfilling the operational criteria for schizotypal personality disorder and those fulfilling the criteria of the Flexible System for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Schizotypal personality disorder does not seem to be a clinical entity in the sense of a traditional personality disorder. The majority of patients diagnosed as borderline personality disorder received a clinical diagnosis of a personality disorder. The DSM-III criteria of borderline personality disorder discriminated satisfactorily against schizophrenia as diagnosed by the Flexible System and as diagnosed according to ICD-9. On the other hand, there was no relationship between the borderline personality disorder diagnosis and any single of the ICD-9 personality disorder types. The patients fulfilling the criteria of the borderline personality disorder were equally distributed across all ICD-9 personality disorder types. They were also significantly younger than both the non-borderline and the ICD-9 personality disorder patients. The relationship between borderline personality disorder criteria and age might thus be of a greater relevance than the relationship between these criteria and a clinical type.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"233 5","pages":"359-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00346086","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A total of 437 acute psychiatric inpatients were investigated with the help of a questionnaire containing DSM-III diagnostic criteria for schizotypal as well as for borderline personality disorder and criteria of the Flexible System for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. All patients were also independently diagnosed according to the ICD-9. The clinical ICD-9 diagnoses were compared with the diagnoses given on the basis of the three operational criteria sets mentioned. Patients fulfilling the operational criteria for schizotypal personality disorder were clinically diagnosed as mostly schizophrenic, and there was also a considerable overlap between the two groups of patients, those fulfilling the operational criteria for schizotypal personality disorder and those fulfilling the criteria of the Flexible System for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Schizotypal personality disorder does not seem to be a clinical entity in the sense of a traditional personality disorder. The majority of patients diagnosed as borderline personality disorder received a clinical diagnosis of a personality disorder. The DSM-III criteria of borderline personality disorder discriminated satisfactorily against schizophrenia as diagnosed by the Flexible System and as diagnosed according to ICD-9. On the other hand, there was no relationship between the borderline personality disorder diagnosis and any single of the ICD-9 personality disorder types. The patients fulfilling the criteria of the borderline personality disorder were equally distributed across all ICD-9 personality disorder types. They were also significantly younger than both the non-borderline and the ICD-9 personality disorder patients. The relationship between borderline personality disorder criteria and age might thus be of a greater relevance than the relationship between these criteria and a clinical type.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断界线。对其概念有效性问题的贡献。
采用包含DSM-III精神分裂症诊断标准、边缘型人格障碍诊断标准和精神分裂症灵活诊断系统标准的问卷,对437例急性精神病住院患者进行调查。所有患者均根据ICD-9独立诊断。将ICD-9的临床诊断与基于上述三个操作标准的诊断进行比较。符合分裂型人格障碍操作标准的患者在临床诊断中多为精神分裂症患者,符合分裂型人格障碍操作标准的患者和符合精神分裂症灵活系统诊断标准的患者两组患者之间也存在相当大的重叠。精神分裂型人格障碍似乎不是传统意义上的人格障碍的临床实体。大多数被诊断为边缘型人格障碍的患者都接受了人格障碍的临床诊断。DSM-III的边缘型人格障碍标准对灵活系统诊断的精神分裂症和ICD-9诊断的精神分裂症进行了令人满意的区分。另一方面,边缘型人格障碍诊断与ICD-9中任何一种人格障碍类型之间没有关系。符合边缘型人格障碍标准的患者平均分布在所有ICD-9型人格障碍类型中。他们也明显比非边缘型人格障碍患者和ICD-9型人格障碍患者年轻。因此,边缘型人格障碍标准与年龄之间的关系可能比这些标准与临床类型之间的关系更有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenylethylamine and phenylacetic acid in CSF of schizophrenics and healthy controls. [Isolation and forced injection in the opinion of affected patients and patient care personnel. An accompanied quarter year sample]. Computerized tomography in tardive dyskinesia. Evidence of structural abnormalities in the basal ganglia system. Chemistry, physiology and neuropsychology of schizophrenia: towards an earlier diagnosis of schizophrenia I. Language and cognitive deficits resulting from medial and dorsolateral frontal lobe lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1