[Validity of the syndrome scales in the AMDP-system].

R Gebhardt, A Pietzcker
{"title":"[Validity of the syndrome scales in the AMDP-system].","authors":"R Gebhardt,&nbsp;A Pietzcker","doi":"10.1007/BF00342790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine the validity of the syndrome scales of the AMDP system, various diagnostic groups as defined by the ICD were described by these scales and distinguished from each other by discriminant analyses. As a comparison the same diagnostic groups were distinguished using the syndrome scales of the AMP system. The analyses using the AMDP system were performed in a sample of 659 patients of the Psychiatric Clinic of the Free University of Berlin during 1979-1980, the analyses with the AMP system in a sample of 2269 patients of the same clinic during the period 1971-1976. It could be shown that different endogenous and organic psychoses as well as neuroses can be described in their psychopathology and discriminated from each other by means of the syndrome scales of the AMDP system. The validity of the syndrome scales in relation to this criterion could be proved. Moreover, we found a high similarity between the results with the AMDP system and the results with the AMP system, which demonstrates that the two systems compare well.</p>","PeriodicalId":55482,"journal":{"name":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","volume":"233 6","pages":"509-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF00342790","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00342790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

To examine the validity of the syndrome scales of the AMDP system, various diagnostic groups as defined by the ICD were described by these scales and distinguished from each other by discriminant analyses. As a comparison the same diagnostic groups were distinguished using the syndrome scales of the AMP system. The analyses using the AMDP system were performed in a sample of 659 patients of the Psychiatric Clinic of the Free University of Berlin during 1979-1980, the analyses with the AMP system in a sample of 2269 patients of the same clinic during the period 1971-1976. It could be shown that different endogenous and organic psychoses as well as neuroses can be described in their psychopathology and discriminated from each other by means of the syndrome scales of the AMDP system. The validity of the syndrome scales in relation to this criterion could be proved. Moreover, we found a high similarity between the results with the AMDP system and the results with the AMP system, which demonstrates that the two systems compare well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[症状量表在amdp系统中的有效性]。
为了检验AMDP系统的证候量表的有效性,用这些量表描述了ICD定义的各种诊断组,并通过判别分析进行了区分。作为比较,使用AMP系统的证候量表来区分相同的诊断组。使用AMDP系统对1979-1980年间柏林自由大学精神病学诊所的659名患者样本进行分析,1971-1976年间同一诊所的2269名患者样本使用AMP系统进行分析。结果表明,不同的内源性和器质性精神病以及神经症可以用AMDP系统的证候量表进行精神病理描述和区分。证候量表与此标准的关系的有效性可以被证明。此外,我们发现AMDP系统的结果与AMP系统的结果具有很高的相似性,这表明两种系统具有良好的对比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenylethylamine and phenylacetic acid in CSF of schizophrenics and healthy controls. [Isolation and forced injection in the opinion of affected patients and patient care personnel. An accompanied quarter year sample]. Computerized tomography in tardive dyskinesia. Evidence of structural abnormalities in the basal ganglia system. Chemistry, physiology and neuropsychology of schizophrenia: towards an earlier diagnosis of schizophrenia I. Language and cognitive deficits resulting from medial and dorsolateral frontal lobe lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1