Effects of two procedural modifications of the frequency of false-alarm responses during pure-tone threshold determination.

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1983-07-01
J E Dancer, M Conn
{"title":"Effects of two procedural modifications of the frequency of false-alarm responses during pure-tone threshold determination.","authors":"J E Dancer,&nbsp;M Conn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In normal-hearing young adults without tinnitus, HTLs were collected using 5-db steps, and false alarms (FA's) noted, at octaves from .25-8 kc/s either in quiet or in a white noise background set at 15 db sensation level for each S. In Exper. I (N:10), the ascending and descending modes did not yield significantly different numbers of FA's in quiet; in noise, FA's increased significantly vs the quiet condition in the ascending but not in the descending modes, while in noise, furthermore, FA's increased significantly for the ascending vs the descending mode. In a similar Exper. II (N:10), the 4 combinations (single- and pulsed-tone presentations, ascending and descending modes) showed that FA's were significantly fewest with a descending, pulsed-tone technique. It was recommended that when FA's pose a problem when using the ascending mode, single-tone technique (ASHA guidelines), the clinician change to the descending, pulse-tone technique to reduce FA's by increasing the stimulus certainty under difficult listening circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"23 3","pages":"215-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In normal-hearing young adults without tinnitus, HTLs were collected using 5-db steps, and false alarms (FA's) noted, at octaves from .25-8 kc/s either in quiet or in a white noise background set at 15 db sensation level for each S. In Exper. I (N:10), the ascending and descending modes did not yield significantly different numbers of FA's in quiet; in noise, FA's increased significantly vs the quiet condition in the ascending but not in the descending modes, while in noise, furthermore, FA's increased significantly for the ascending vs the descending mode. In a similar Exper. II (N:10), the 4 combinations (single- and pulsed-tone presentations, ascending and descending modes) showed that FA's were significantly fewest with a descending, pulsed-tone technique. It was recommended that when FA's pose a problem when using the ascending mode, single-tone technique (ASHA guidelines), the clinician change to the descending, pulse-tone technique to reduce FA's by increasing the stimulus certainty under difficult listening circumstances.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在纯音阈值确定过程中两次程序修改对假警报响应频率的影响。
在没有耳鸣的听力正常的年轻人中,以5db的步骤收集HTLs,并在安静或白噪声背景下以每s 15 db的感觉水平在0.25 -8 kc/s的八度范围内记录假警报(FA)。I (N:10),在安静状态下,上升和下降模式产生的FA数量没有显著差异;在噪声条件下,相对于安静条件,FA在上升模式下显著增加,而在下降模式下无显著增加,而在噪声条件下,FA在上升模式下比在下降模式下显著增加。在一个类似的专家。II (N:10), 4种组合(单音和脉冲音表现,上升和下降模式)表明,下降、脉冲音技术的FA明显最少。建议临床医生在使用上升模式单音技术(ASHA指南)时,当FA出现问题时,应改为下降模式脉冲音技术,在困难的听力环境下,通过增加刺激确定性来减少FA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fabrication of a new headset for air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. Speech reception thresholds for digits. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1