Comparison of occupational hearing losses among military engineers and their civilian counterparts.

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1983-10-01
J L Fletcher, D W Chandler
{"title":"Comparison of occupational hearing losses among military engineers and their civilian counterparts.","authors":"J L Fletcher,&nbsp;D W Chandler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A previous study (Chandler and Fletcher, J. Aud. Res., 1983, 23, 23-32) examined group hearing loss of 209 U.S. Army engineers by comparing current with reference audiograms. The sample was categorized by military occupation specialty, age, and time on job. The present study reports comparable data for 187 civilian engineers on the same Army post exposed to essentially the same noise. These had less hearing loss than their military counterparts. Some reasons are suggested, such as attrition of the civilian workforce because of hearing problems, and a likely greater exposure of the military engineers to noises not job-related. Age was less important than time on the job. Both groups, however, exhibited significantly lower hearing levels than the industrial population of Glorig et al (Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol., 1957) at the 1954 Wisconsin State Fair, possibly because both military and civilian personnel at this Army post had been for some years in an aggressive hearing conservation program.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"23 4","pages":"241-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A previous study (Chandler and Fletcher, J. Aud. Res., 1983, 23, 23-32) examined group hearing loss of 209 U.S. Army engineers by comparing current with reference audiograms. The sample was categorized by military occupation specialty, age, and time on job. The present study reports comparable data for 187 civilian engineers on the same Army post exposed to essentially the same noise. These had less hearing loss than their military counterparts. Some reasons are suggested, such as attrition of the civilian workforce because of hearing problems, and a likely greater exposure of the military engineers to noises not job-related. Age was less important than time on the job. Both groups, however, exhibited significantly lower hearing levels than the industrial population of Glorig et al (Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol., 1957) at the 1954 Wisconsin State Fair, possibly because both military and civilian personnel at this Army post had been for some years in an aggressive hearing conservation program.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军事工兵与平民工兵职业性听力损失的比较。
先前的一项研究(钱德勒和弗莱彻,j。Res., 1983, 23,23 -32)对209名美国陆军工程兵的群体听力损失进行了研究,通过比较当前听力图和参考听力图。样本按军事职业专业、年龄和在职时间进行分类。本研究报告了同一陆军员额上的187名文职工程人员接触到基本上相同噪音的可比数据。这些人的听力损失比军人少。提出了一些原因,例如由于听力问题导致文职劳动力的流失,以及军事工程师可能更多地接触到与工作无关的噪音。工作时间比年龄更重要。然而,两组小鼠的听力水平都明显低于格洛里格等人的工业人群。专科学校角膜切削。Otolaryngol。在1954年的威斯康辛州博览会上,可能是因为在这个陆军岗位上的军事人员和文职人员多年来一直在积极地进行听力保护计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fabrication of a new headset for air- and bone-conduction audiometry. Conditions under which the Haas precedence effect may or may not occur. Auditory localization in a free field using discrimination procedures. Speech reception thresholds for digits. Effect of warble-tone frequency deviation on threshold measurement in cases with sloping audiometric configurations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1