Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104844
Tiantian Zhao , Hao Xu , Dazhen Tang , Peng Zong
{"title":"Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation","authors":"Tiantian Zhao ,&nbsp;Hao Xu ,&nbsp;Dazhen Tang ,&nbsp;Peng Zong","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Matrix shrinkage is a factor that must be considered in the dynamic permeability model of coal reservoirs. The mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting confining pressure (confining pressure mechanism) has been modeled by analogy with thermal expansion, and it is widely used in permeability model construction. However, the mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting porosity (porosity mechanism) has not been widely recognized and modeled, and this mechanism independently controls porosity even though neither confining pressure nor </span>pore pressure<span> changes (only the replacement of different adsorbed gases occurs). The porosity mechanism and a permeability model that takes into account the dual mechanism have been modeled recently. This study compares the two mechanisms of matrix shrinkage by theoretical analysis of the mathematic relations in the permeability models considering different mechanisms and by finite element numerical simulations of coalbed methane<span> development considering different mechanisms. Theoretical analysis shows that the effect of the porosity mechanism on permeability is more than 1.5 times that of the confining pressure mechanism. the numerical simulations results show that: considering the porosity mechanism and the confining pressure mechanism simultaneously allows for a larger and earlier improvement in permeability and a larger reservoir area to improve, and a significant improvement of 28% in gas production rate occurs compared with the case only the confining pressure mechanism were considered. This study reveals the importance of porosity mechanism in describing the dynamic evolution of reservoir permeability and production dynamics accurately, and provides a scientific basis for coalbed methane development.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matrix shrinkage is a factor that must be considered in the dynamic permeability model of coal reservoirs. The mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting confining pressure (confining pressure mechanism) has been modeled by analogy with thermal expansion, and it is widely used in permeability model construction. However, the mechanism of matrix shrinkage affecting porosity (porosity mechanism) has not been widely recognized and modeled, and this mechanism independently controls porosity even though neither confining pressure nor pore pressure changes (only the replacement of different adsorbed gases occurs). The porosity mechanism and a permeability model that takes into account the dual mechanism have been modeled recently. This study compares the two mechanisms of matrix shrinkage by theoretical analysis of the mathematic relations in the permeability models considering different mechanisms and by finite element numerical simulations of coalbed methane development considering different mechanisms. Theoretical analysis shows that the effect of the porosity mechanism on permeability is more than 1.5 times that of the confining pressure mechanism. the numerical simulations results show that: considering the porosity mechanism and the confining pressure mechanism simultaneously allows for a larger and earlier improvement in permeability and a larger reservoir area to improve, and a significant improvement of 28% in gas production rate occurs compared with the case only the confining pressure mechanism were considered. This study reveals the importance of porosity mechanism in describing the dynamic evolution of reservoir permeability and production dynamics accurately, and provides a scientific basis for coalbed methane development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤储层基质收缩影响渗透率演化和产气的双重机制:理论分析与数值模拟
基质收缩是煤储层动态渗透率模型中必须考虑的一个因素。基体收缩影响围压的机理(围压机理)已通过热膨胀类比建模,在渗透率模型构建中得到广泛应用。然而,基质收缩影响孔隙度的机理(孔隙机制)尚未得到广泛的认识和建模,即使围压和孔压都没有变化(只是不同吸附气体的替换),这一机制也能独立控制孔隙度。近年来建立了孔隙机制和考虑双重机制的渗透率模型。通过对考虑不同机理的渗透率模型数学关系的理论分析和考虑不同机理的煤层气开发有限元数值模拟,比较了两种基质收缩机理。理论分析表明,孔隙度机制对渗透率的影响是围压机制的1.5倍以上。数值模拟结果表明:同时考虑孔隙度机制和围压机制,可以更早、更大幅度地提高渗透率,提高储层面积,与只考虑围压机制相比,产气量显著提高28%。该研究揭示了孔隙度机理对准确描述储层渗透率动态演化和生产动态的重要性,为煤层气开发提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market. An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Machine learning for drilling applications: A review Quantitative characterization of methane adsorption in shale using low-field NMR Dual mechanisms of matrix shrinkage affecting permeability evolution and gas production in coal reservoirs: Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation Experimental study on the effect of hydrate reformation on gas permeability of marine sediments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1