Multielemental analysis of oils and animal fat by using deep eutectic solvents assisted by an aerosol phase extraction procedure

IF 4.1 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Talanta Open Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.talo.2023.100234
Ana Torres , Ismael Romero , Raquel Sánchez , Ana Beltrán , Gabriela Guillena , José-Luis Todolí
{"title":"Multielemental analysis of oils and animal fat by using deep eutectic solvents assisted by an aerosol phase extraction procedure","authors":"Ana Torres ,&nbsp;Ismael Romero ,&nbsp;Raquel Sánchez ,&nbsp;Ana Beltrán ,&nbsp;Gabriela Guillena ,&nbsp;José-Luis Todolí","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2023.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, thirteen elements (Ag, Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb) have been extracted from used cooking oils, olive oils and animal fat. Either inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) or tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS) have been chosen as detection techniques. Due to the difficulty of directly introducing highly viscous organic samples into the spectrometer, a fast dispersive liquid – liquid aerosol phase extraction (DLLAPE) method has been selected to isolate the analytes from the sample matrix. The DLLAPE is based on the generation of an aerosol from the extracting phase with the help of a pneumatic nebulizer. This high velocity aerosol impacts and penetrates in the liquid sample. Consequently, the liquid – liquid exchange surface area becomes high, thus leading to high extraction yields. A hydrophilic deep eutectic solvent (DES) consisting of choline chloride and ethylene glycol (1:2 mass ratio) has been selected as the extracting solvent. Prior to undertaking the experiments, the extraction method has been evaluated in terms of precision under suitable conditions. In comparison with conventional methods based on sample digestion, sample dilution and shot analysis or extraction assisted by vortex agitation, the DLLAPE shows several advantages, because it is faster, and it provides lower limits of detection than the reference methodologies. The procedural limits of quantification for the determined elements with the DLLAPE in ICP-OES were 0.046 (Ag), 0.396 (Al), 0.013 (Cd), 0.033 (Cr), 0.040 (Cu), 0.20 (Fe), 0.026 (K), 0.026 (Li), 0.33 (Mg), 0.013 (Mn), 2.64 (Ni) and 0.53 (Pb) mg kg<sup>−1</sup>. Meanwhile, pLOQ in ICP-MS/MS lowered by roughly one order of magnitude. The accuracy of the aerosol phase extraction method has been evaluated through the determination of the recoveries for four representative analytes (Ca, Cu, Mg and Ni) from spiked real samples. For these elements, recovery has taken values of (100 ± 20)%. Moreover, a comparison of the multielemental concentration obtained with conventional methods (<em>c.a.</em>, sample dilution and shot ICP analysis and liquid-liquid extraction using a vortex agitator) against that measured with the DLLAPE has been carried out. Multiemelemental concentrations have been obtained for real samples and the found levels have been similar to those encountered in previously published works.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831923000541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the present study, thirteen elements (Ag, Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Li, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb) have been extracted from used cooking oils, olive oils and animal fat. Either inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) or tandem mass spectrometry (ICP-MS/MS) have been chosen as detection techniques. Due to the difficulty of directly introducing highly viscous organic samples into the spectrometer, a fast dispersive liquid – liquid aerosol phase extraction (DLLAPE) method has been selected to isolate the analytes from the sample matrix. The DLLAPE is based on the generation of an aerosol from the extracting phase with the help of a pneumatic nebulizer. This high velocity aerosol impacts and penetrates in the liquid sample. Consequently, the liquid – liquid exchange surface area becomes high, thus leading to high extraction yields. A hydrophilic deep eutectic solvent (DES) consisting of choline chloride and ethylene glycol (1:2 mass ratio) has been selected as the extracting solvent. Prior to undertaking the experiments, the extraction method has been evaluated in terms of precision under suitable conditions. In comparison with conventional methods based on sample digestion, sample dilution and shot analysis or extraction assisted by vortex agitation, the DLLAPE shows several advantages, because it is faster, and it provides lower limits of detection than the reference methodologies. The procedural limits of quantification for the determined elements with the DLLAPE in ICP-OES were 0.046 (Ag), 0.396 (Al), 0.013 (Cd), 0.033 (Cr), 0.040 (Cu), 0.20 (Fe), 0.026 (K), 0.026 (Li), 0.33 (Mg), 0.013 (Mn), 2.64 (Ni) and 0.53 (Pb) mg kg−1. Meanwhile, pLOQ in ICP-MS/MS lowered by roughly one order of magnitude. The accuracy of the aerosol phase extraction method has been evaluated through the determination of the recoveries for four representative analytes (Ca, Cu, Mg and Ni) from spiked real samples. For these elements, recovery has taken values of (100 ± 20)%. Moreover, a comparison of the multielemental concentration obtained with conventional methods (c.a., sample dilution and shot ICP analysis and liquid-liquid extraction using a vortex agitator) against that measured with the DLLAPE has been carried out. Multiemelemental concentrations have been obtained for real samples and the found levels have been similar to those encountered in previously published works.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用气溶胶相萃取法辅助的深共晶溶剂对油和动物脂肪进行多元素分析
本研究从废食用油、橄榄油和动物脂肪中提取了Ag、Al、Ba、Cd、Cr、Cu、Fe、K、Li、Mg、Mn、Ni、Pb等13种元素。电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-OES)和串联质谱法(ICP-MS/MS)已被作为检测技术。由于高粘性有机样品难以直接导入光谱仪,因此选择了快速色散液-液气溶胶相萃取(DLLAPE)方法从样品基质中分离分析物。DLLAPE是基于在气动雾化器的帮助下从提取阶段产生气溶胶。这种高速气溶胶撞击并穿透液体样品。因此,液-液交换表面积变大,从而导致高萃取率。选择由氯化胆碱和乙二醇(质量比为1:2)组成的亲水深共晶溶剂(DES)作为提取溶剂。在进行实验之前,在适当的条件下对提取方法的精度进行了评估。与传统的基于样品消化、样品稀释和样品分析或涡流搅拌辅助提取的方法相比,DLLAPE显示出几个优点,因为它更快,并且比参考方法提供更低的检测限。ICP-OES中DLLAPE的定量限分别为0.046 (Ag)、0.396 (Al)、0.013 (Cd)、0.033 (Cr)、0.040 (Cu)、0.20 (Fe)、0.026 (K)、0.026 (Li)、0.33 (Mg)、0.013 (Mn)、2.64 (Ni)和0.53 (Pb) Mg kg - 1。同时,ICP-MS/MS的pLOQ降低了大约一个数量级。通过测定四种代表性分析物(Ca、Cu、Mg和Ni)的回收率,对气溶胶相萃取法的准确性进行了评价。这些元素的回收率为(100±20)%。此外,用常规方法(如,样品稀释和注射ICP分析和使用涡流搅拌器的液液萃取)获得的多元素浓度与用DLLAPE测量的浓度进行了比较。已经获得了实际样品的多元素浓度,发现的水平与以前发表的作品中遇到的水平相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Talanta Open
Talanta Open Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Continuous-flow analysis of nitrogen compounds in environmental water using a copper–zinc reduction coil Development of engineered Zn-MOF/g-C3N4 based photoelectrochemical system for real-time sensors and removal of naproxen in wastewater Development of nanomaterial-supported molecularly imprinted polymer/receptor-like sensor for the detection of rosuvastatin from binary mixtures Trace-level quantification of NDMA in levosulpuride active pharmaceutical ingredient and tablet formulation Using UFLC-MS/MS Enhancing isomer specificity in mass spectrometry by combining silver ion adduction and ion mobility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1