[Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].

Revista medica de Panama Pub Date : 1995-01-01
M Urrutia, A Macharaviaya, R Rodríguez
{"title":"[Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].","authors":"M Urrutia,&nbsp;A Macharaviaya,&nbsp;R Rodríguez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to show that the nonionic contrast media of low osmolarity are better tolerated than ionic media of high osmolarity, which to date are most frequently used in the authors hospital. We found that adverse reaction occurred in 80% of the group in which nonionic contrast medium was used. The authors conclude that nonionic, low osmolarity contrast media significantly reduce the frequency of adverse reactions and increase their safe use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21235,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Panama","volume":"20 1-2","pages":"20-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Panama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to show that the nonionic contrast media of low osmolarity are better tolerated than ionic media of high osmolarity, which to date are most frequently used in the authors hospital. We found that adverse reaction occurred in 80% of the group in which nonionic contrast medium was used. The authors conclude that nonionic, low osmolarity contrast media significantly reduce the frequency of adverse reactions and increase their safe use.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射造影剂的不良反应离子和非离子介质的比较]。
本研究的目的是表明低渗透压的非离子造影剂比高渗透压的离子造影剂耐受性更好,而高渗透压的离子造影剂是目前笔者所在医院最常用的。我们发现使用非离子型造影剂组有80%发生不良反应。作者得出结论,非离子、低渗透压造影剂显著减少不良反应的频率,增加其使用的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Otitis media with effusion]. [Racial mix of the panamanian population]. [Carbon dioxide angiography: technique and indications]. [Atypical testicular masses: a case presentation]. [C0 vs C2 levels and their implications in kidney transplantation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1