Plateletpheresis-induced increase in platelet reactivity using different cell separators.

F Jung, U Bläsi, H Radtke, C Mrowietz, G Pindur, H Kiesewetter, E Wenzel
{"title":"Plateletpheresis-induced increase in platelet reactivity using different cell separators.","authors":"F Jung,&nbsp;U Bläsi,&nbsp;H Radtke,&nbsp;C Mrowietz,&nbsp;G Pindur,&nbsp;H Kiesewetter,&nbsp;E Wenzel","doi":"10.1159/000223131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since plateletpheresis is being used increasingly, it is important to regard quality control to check health risks for donors and to exclude these.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Controlled randomised prospective open comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>112 platelet donors were examined.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Prior to and after plateletpheresis platelet reactivity was determined. The platelet concentrates in the two groups of 56 donors each were produced using either the cell separator 'CS-3000' and the collecting chamber PLT 30TM with the Omnix system (group I) or the cell separator 'AS-104' (group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I five donors showed a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.1297) after plateletpheresis. In group II there were 10 donors with a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.0046) after plateletpheresis. The mean concentration of platelets was reduced by separation using the CS-3000 Omnix from 238 +/- 49 x 10(3)/microliters to 172 +/- 32 x 10(3)/microliters (68 +/- 27 x 10(3)/microliters) and from 243 +/- 53 x 10(3)/microliters to 180 +/- 31 x 10(3)/microliters (63 +/- 33 x 10(3)/microliters) using the AS-104. In the first case the platelet yield was 3.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate, in the latter case it was 2.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate. The 'CS-3000 Omnix' is significantly more effective in separating (58.4 +/- 15.5%) than the 'AS-104' with 44.2 +/- 7.2% (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since both donor groups were comparable regarding all factors recorded--especially the cardiovascular risk factors--the separation process could be responsible for the different traumatisation of platelets.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"22 4","pages":"237-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223131","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: Since plateletpheresis is being used increasingly, it is important to regard quality control to check health risks for donors and to exclude these.

Design: Controlled randomised prospective open comparative study.

Setting: Department of Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.

Participants: 112 platelet donors were examined.

Interventions: Prior to and after plateletpheresis platelet reactivity was determined. The platelet concentrates in the two groups of 56 donors each were produced using either the cell separator 'CS-3000' and the collecting chamber PLT 30TM with the Omnix system (group I) or the cell separator 'AS-104' (group II).

Results: In group I five donors showed a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.1297) after plateletpheresis. In group II there were 10 donors with a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.0046) after plateletpheresis. The mean concentration of platelets was reduced by separation using the CS-3000 Omnix from 238 +/- 49 x 10(3)/microliters to 172 +/- 32 x 10(3)/microliters (68 +/- 27 x 10(3)/microliters) and from 243 +/- 53 x 10(3)/microliters to 180 +/- 31 x 10(3)/microliters (63 +/- 33 x 10(3)/microliters) using the AS-104. In the first case the platelet yield was 3.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate, in the latter case it was 2.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate. The 'CS-3000 Omnix' is significantly more effective in separating (58.4 +/- 15.5%) than the 'AS-104' with 44.2 +/- 7.2% (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Since both donor groups were comparable regarding all factors recorded--especially the cardiovascular risk factors--the separation process could be responsible for the different traumatisation of platelets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同的细胞分离器诱导血小板反应性的增加。
目的:由于血小板采集越来越多,重视质量控制以检查献血者的健康风险并排除这些风险是很重要的。设计:对照、随机、前瞻性、开放性比较研究。单位:某大学门诊输血内科。参与者:112名血小板献血者。干预措施:测定采血小板前后血小板反应性。两组56例献血者的血小板浓缩液分别采用采用Omnix系统的细胞分离器CS-3000和收集室PLT 30TM(ⅰ组)或细胞分离器AS-104(ⅱ组)。结果:ⅰ组5例献血者采血小板后血小板反应性病理增高(p = 0.1297)。II组有10例献血者采血小板后血小板反应性病理增高(p = 0.0046)。使用CS-3000 Omnix分离血小板的平均浓度从238 +/- 49 × 10(3)/微升降低到172 +/- 32 × 10(3)/微升(68 +/- 27 × 10(3)/微升),使用AS-104分离血小板的平均浓度从243 +/- 53 × 10(3)/微升降低到180 +/- 31 × 10(3)/微升(63 +/- 33 × 10(3)/微升)。在第一种情况下,血小板产量为3.9 × 10(11)个血小板/浓缩物,在后一种情况下为2.9 × 10(11)个血小板/浓缩物。“CS-3000 Omnix”的分离效率(58.4 +/- 15.5%)明显高于“AS-104”(44.2 +/- 7.2%)(p < 0.0001)。结论:由于两个供体组在记录的所有因素上都具有可比性,尤其是心血管危险因素,分离过程可能是造成血小板损伤不同的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platelet Concentrates from Automated Apheresis - Past, Present and Future Developments. Arificial Oxygen Carriers as Red Blood Cell Substitutes - Perfluorocarbons and Cell-Free Hemoglobin. Transfusion-Associated Infections with Cytomegalovirus and Other Human Herpesviruses. Comparison of Solvent/Detergent-Inactivated Plasma and Fresh Frozen Plasma under Routine Clinical Conditions. Coexisting Anti-I/i Plus Anti Pr Cold Agglutinins in Individual Sera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1