[Possibilities and limits of anti-HCV antibody screening in the blood donation service].

B Fölsch, C Gabriel, M M Wilders-Truschnig, G Lanzer
{"title":"[Possibilities and limits of anti-HCV antibody screening in the blood donation service].","authors":"B Fölsch,&nbsp;C Gabriel,&nbsp;M M Wilders-Truschnig,&nbsp;G Lanzer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is responsible for the majority of post-transfusion hepatitis cases. We compared the correlation and reproducibility of different screening and confirmatory tests.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>1,406 samples of voluntary blood donors were tested in parallel using 3 enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assays (ELISA) for HCV antibodies. Those samples that were positive in at least 1 of the 3 tests were additionally tested in a 3rd-generation ELISA as well as in 3 different confirmatory tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13 samples (0.92%) were repeat reactive in at least 1 of the ELISAs with different results in the confirmatory tests. Only 3 samples (0.21%) with high sample/cutoff ratios in the ELISAs were positive in all 3 confirmatory tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reproducibility of the tested ELISAs and the correlation with confirmatory tests were good only in samples with a high signal to cutoff ratio. Two different high-positive ELISA results can be regarded as confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"21 6","pages":"388-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is responsible for the majority of post-transfusion hepatitis cases. We compared the correlation and reproducibility of different screening and confirmatory tests.

Material and methods: 1,406 samples of voluntary blood donors were tested in parallel using 3 enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assays (ELISA) for HCV antibodies. Those samples that were positive in at least 1 of the 3 tests were additionally tested in a 3rd-generation ELISA as well as in 3 different confirmatory tests.

Results: 13 samples (0.92%) were repeat reactive in at least 1 of the ELISAs with different results in the confirmatory tests. Only 3 samples (0.21%) with high sample/cutoff ratios in the ELISAs were positive in all 3 confirmatory tests.

Conclusions: The reproducibility of the tested ELISAs and the correlation with confirmatory tests were good only in samples with a high signal to cutoff ratio. Two different high-positive ELISA results can be regarded as confirmation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[献血服务中抗hcv抗体筛查的可能性和局限性]。
背景:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)是大多数输血后肝炎病例的原因。我们比较了不同筛选试验和验证试验的相关性和可重复性。材料和方法:采用3种酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)平行检测1406份自愿献血者的HCV抗体。在3项检测中至少1项呈阳性的样本,在第三代酶联免疫吸附试验以及3种不同的确认性检测中进行额外检测。结果:13份样品(0.92%)在至少1种酶联免疫吸附试验中有重复反应,且确认试验结果不同。只有3个样品(0.21%)在所有3个确认试验中均呈高样本/截止比的阳性。结论:仅在高信号截止比的样品中,elisa的重复性及与验证性试验的相关性较好。两种不同的ELISA高阳性结果可视为确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Platelet Concentrates from Automated Apheresis - Past, Present and Future Developments. Arificial Oxygen Carriers as Red Blood Cell Substitutes - Perfluorocarbons and Cell-Free Hemoglobin. Transfusion-Associated Infections with Cytomegalovirus and Other Human Herpesviruses. Comparison of Solvent/Detergent-Inactivated Plasma and Fresh Frozen Plasma under Routine Clinical Conditions. Coexisting Anti-I/i Plus Anti Pr Cold Agglutinins in Individual Sera.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1