Relationships between morphometric and mitochondrial DNA differentiation in laboratory strains of musk shrews (Suncus murinus).

Idengaku zasshi Pub Date : 1995-02-01 DOI:10.1266/jjg.70.57
A Ishikawa, T Yamagata, T Namikawa
{"title":"Relationships between morphometric and mitochondrial DNA differentiation in laboratory strains of musk shrews (Suncus murinus).","authors":"A Ishikawa,&nbsp;T Yamagata,&nbsp;T Namikawa","doi":"10.1266/jjg.70.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morphometric differentiation among six strains of musk shrews (Suncus murinus) originating in Bangladesh (BAN), Sri Lanka (SRI), and four Japanese areas, Nagasaki (NAG), Okinawa Island (OKI), Tokunoshima Island (TKU), and Taramajima Island (TR), was examined by use of skull and external measurements. These data were compared with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) differentiation previously reported. Significant sexual dimorphism was observed in all morphometric characters of the six strains, except for two characters in the TR strain. The six strains were clearly grouped by principal component analysis into three body-size types: large BAN shrews, intermediate SRI shrews, and small Japanese shrews. By canonical discriminant analysis, the NAG strain was further distinct from the other three Japanese strains despite their apparent similarities in external morphology, and was characterized by having the most unusual shape in the six strains. No individuals were misclassified as to their geographic origin for both sexes of the six strains. The morphometric differentiation pattern based on only the first canonical variate, extracting an overall size factor, was concordant with the mtDNA differentiation pattern (rss = 0.944, P < 0.001 in males and rss = 0.930, P < 0.001 in females). In contrast, the morphometric differentiation pattern estimated from the second to the fifth canonical variates, representing shape factors, was apparently discordant with the mtDNA differentiation pattern (rss = 0.467, P > 0.05 in both sexes). It was previously reported that a partial premating reproductive isolation mechanism is caused by the difference in body size between mating pairs. Thus, body size may be a factor useful for understanding the mechanisms of population differentiation in this species.</p>","PeriodicalId":13120,"journal":{"name":"Idengaku zasshi","volume":"70 1","pages":"57-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1266/jjg.70.57","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Idengaku zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.70.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Morphometric differentiation among six strains of musk shrews (Suncus murinus) originating in Bangladesh (BAN), Sri Lanka (SRI), and four Japanese areas, Nagasaki (NAG), Okinawa Island (OKI), Tokunoshima Island (TKU), and Taramajima Island (TR), was examined by use of skull and external measurements. These data were compared with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) differentiation previously reported. Significant sexual dimorphism was observed in all morphometric characters of the six strains, except for two characters in the TR strain. The six strains were clearly grouped by principal component analysis into three body-size types: large BAN shrews, intermediate SRI shrews, and small Japanese shrews. By canonical discriminant analysis, the NAG strain was further distinct from the other three Japanese strains despite their apparent similarities in external morphology, and was characterized by having the most unusual shape in the six strains. No individuals were misclassified as to their geographic origin for both sexes of the six strains. The morphometric differentiation pattern based on only the first canonical variate, extracting an overall size factor, was concordant with the mtDNA differentiation pattern (rss = 0.944, P < 0.001 in males and rss = 0.930, P < 0.001 in females). In contrast, the morphometric differentiation pattern estimated from the second to the fifth canonical variates, representing shape factors, was apparently discordant with the mtDNA differentiation pattern (rss = 0.467, P > 0.05 in both sexes). It was previously reported that a partial premating reproductive isolation mechanism is caused by the difference in body size between mating pairs. Thus, body size may be a factor useful for understanding the mechanisms of population differentiation in this species.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麝鼠(Suncus murinus)实验室品系形态计量学与线粒体DNA分化的关系。
采用颅骨和体外测量的方法,研究了原产于孟加拉国(BAN)、斯里兰卡(Sri)和日本长崎(NAG)、冲绳岛(OKI)、德野岛(TKU)和原岛(TR)的6株麝香鼩(Suncus murinus)的形态分化。这些数据与先前报道的线粒体DNA (mtDNA)分化进行了比较。除TR菌株的2个性状外,6个菌株的形态特征均存在显著的性别二态性。主成分分析明确将这6个菌株分为3种体型类型:大型BAN鼩鼱、中等SRI鼩鼱和小型日本鼩鼱。典型判别分析表明,NAG菌株与其他3株日本菌株在外观形态上具有明显的相似性,且外形特征在6株菌株中最为不寻常。在6个菌株中,没有个体被错误地分类为其地理来源。仅基于第一个典型变量提取总体尺寸因子的形态计量分化模式与mtDNA分化模式一致(男性的rss = 0.944, P < 0.001,女性的rss = 0.930, P < 0.001)。相比之下,从第2到第5个典型变量(代表形状因子)估计的形态计量分化模式与mtDNA分化模式明显不一致(rss = 0.467,两性P > 0.05)。以前有报道称,交配对之间的体型差异导致了部分的早熟生殖隔离机制。因此,体型大小可能是了解该物种种群分化机制的一个有用因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mitochondrial plasmid-like DNAs of the B1 family in the genus Oryza: sequence heterogeneity and evolution. Molecular clock for dating of divergence between animal phyla. Regional localization of rat and mouse protein-tyrosine phosphatase PTP alpha/LRP gene (Ptpra) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Polymorphic distribution and molecular diversification of mitochondrial plasmid-like DNAs in the genus Oryza. Adaptive significance of amylase polymorphism in Drosophila. X. Analysis of alpha-amylase activity of two amylase variants in individual Drosophila subobscura flies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1