Viral hepatitis serological markers among pregnant women in Caracas, Venezuela: implication for perinatal transmission of hepatitis B and C.

G.E.N Pub Date : 1994-01-01
F H Pujol, I Rodríguez, N Martínez, C Borberg, M O Favorov, H A Fields, F Liprandi
{"title":"Viral hepatitis serological markers among pregnant women in Caracas, Venezuela: implication for perinatal transmission of hepatitis B and C.","authors":"F H Pujol,&nbsp;I Rodríguez,&nbsp;N Martínez,&nbsp;C Borberg,&nbsp;M O Favorov,&nbsp;H A Fields,&nbsp;F Liprandi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viral hepatitis serological markers were analyzed in two groups of pregnant women residing in Caracas from: 1) a maternity unit at the moment of delivery (106 sera, low income population), and 2) a private clinic during the third trimester of pregnancy (105 sera, medium-high economic class population). A higher percent positivity was observed in the maternity unit compared to the private clinic for hepatitis A virus (HAV) as measured by anti-HAV activity (96% vs 48%; p < 0.01%), for hepatitis B virus (HBV) as measured by anti-HBc activity (13% vs 2%; p < 0.01%), but not for HBV carriage, as measured by HBsAg (3.8% vs 0%; p = 0.06 %). These differences appear to correlate with the socio-economic level. All the HBsAg positive sera were HBeAg negative and negative for the presence of DNA by PCR, confirming the low rate of perinatal transmission observed in Venezuela. Two out of 106 sera (1.9%) were positive for HCV antibodies in the maternity unit and 0/105 in the private clinic, although these differences were non significant (N.S.). Two out of 106 sera (1.9%) were positive for HEV antibodies in the maternity unit and 1/80 (1.3%) in the private clinic (N.S.). The anti-HEV seropositivity probably reflects a past infection. The importance of testing these viral markers during pregnancy is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75872,"journal":{"name":"G.E.N","volume":"48 1","pages":"25-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G.E.N","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Viral hepatitis serological markers were analyzed in two groups of pregnant women residing in Caracas from: 1) a maternity unit at the moment of delivery (106 sera, low income population), and 2) a private clinic during the third trimester of pregnancy (105 sera, medium-high economic class population). A higher percent positivity was observed in the maternity unit compared to the private clinic for hepatitis A virus (HAV) as measured by anti-HAV activity (96% vs 48%; p < 0.01%), for hepatitis B virus (HBV) as measured by anti-HBc activity (13% vs 2%; p < 0.01%), but not for HBV carriage, as measured by HBsAg (3.8% vs 0%; p = 0.06 %). These differences appear to correlate with the socio-economic level. All the HBsAg positive sera were HBeAg negative and negative for the presence of DNA by PCR, confirming the low rate of perinatal transmission observed in Venezuela. Two out of 106 sera (1.9%) were positive for HCV antibodies in the maternity unit and 0/105 in the private clinic, although these differences were non significant (N.S.). Two out of 106 sera (1.9%) were positive for HEV antibodies in the maternity unit and 1/80 (1.3%) in the private clinic (N.S.). The anti-HEV seropositivity probably reflects a past infection. The importance of testing these viral markers during pregnancy is discussed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在加拉加斯,委内瑞拉孕妇病毒性肝炎血清学标志物:乙肝和丙肝围产期传播的含义。
对居住在加拉加斯的两组孕妇进行病毒性肝炎血清学标志物分析:1)分娩时的产科病房(106份血清,低收入人群)和2)妊娠晚期的私人诊所(105份血清,中高经济阶层人群)。与私人诊所相比,产科病房的甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)阳性率更高,以抗HAV活性来衡量(96%对48%;p < 0.01%),通过抗hbc活性测量乙型肝炎病毒(HBV) (13% vs 2%;p < 0.01%),但HBsAg测量的HBV携带者不存在(3.8% vs 0%;P = 0.06%)。这些差异似乎与社会经济水平有关。所有HBsAg阳性血清均为HBeAg阴性,PCR检测为DNA阴性,证实委内瑞拉围产期传播率低。106份血清中有2份(1.9%)在产科病房呈HCV抗体阳性,在私人诊所为0/105,尽管这些差异不显着(注1)。产科病房106份血清中有2份(1.9%)HEV抗体阳性,私立诊所(N.S.)为1/80(1.3%)。抗戊型肝炎血清阳性可能反映了过去的感染。讨论了在怀孕期间检测这些病毒标记物的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatitis C virus]. [Evaluation of methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection]. [Leptospirosis in Gastroenterology. Study of 14 cases in the Hospital Universitário de Caracas 1984-1994]. [Gastrointestinal stromal sarcoma. Report of a case and review of the literature]. [Von Recklinghausen disease and hepatic neurofibromatosis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1