[Evaluation of methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection].

G.E.N Pub Date : 1995-10-01
N Serrano, Z Carvajal, R Piñero, M L Irrestarazu
{"title":"[Evaluation of methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection].","authors":"N Serrano,&nbsp;Z Carvajal,&nbsp;R Piñero,&nbsp;M L Irrestarazu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Helicobacter pylori is a gram negative curved bacillus recognized as etiologic agent of chronic gastritis and an important factor in the development of duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer. The purpose of this work is to evaluate three microbiologic methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection. We studied 375 samples from 218 patients, who consulted at the Department of Gastroenterology of the Hospital Vargas and were candidates for endoscopy. Samples of gastric mucous tissue were taken at level of the antrum and each sample was stained with Gram, tested for urease and cultured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>whit H. pylori positive 123 patients with duodenal ulcer at the endoscopy (91.1%), 17 had gastric ulcer (76.5%), 40 gastritis and/or duodenitis (60.0%), 1 duodenal ulcer and gastric (100.0%) and 37 normal endoscopies (56.8%). Evaluating the three methods used we found that of the 286 H. pylori positive samples, the Gram stain detected 282 (sensibility 98.6% and specificity 96.6%); the urease test 276 (sensibility 96.5% and specificity 98.6%) and culture was positive in 255 samples (sensibility 89.2% and specificity 100.0%). These results show that both the Gram stain and Urease test are useful for diagnosing H. pylori infection due to their high sensitivity and specificity, rapidness, low cost for the Gram stain, and easy interpretation for Urease test. Culture, even though less sensitivity++, represents the most unquestionable diagnosis and permits carrying out susceptibility to antimicrobials tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":75872,"journal":{"name":"G.E.N","volume":"49 4","pages":"292-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G.E.N","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Helicobacter pylori is a gram negative curved bacillus recognized as etiologic agent of chronic gastritis and an important factor in the development of duodenal ulcer and gastric cancer. The purpose of this work is to evaluate three microbiologic methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection. We studied 375 samples from 218 patients, who consulted at the Department of Gastroenterology of the Hospital Vargas and were candidates for endoscopy. Samples of gastric mucous tissue were taken at level of the antrum and each sample was stained with Gram, tested for urease and cultured.

Results: whit H. pylori positive 123 patients with duodenal ulcer at the endoscopy (91.1%), 17 had gastric ulcer (76.5%), 40 gastritis and/or duodenitis (60.0%), 1 duodenal ulcer and gastric (100.0%) and 37 normal endoscopies (56.8%). Evaluating the three methods used we found that of the 286 H. pylori positive samples, the Gram stain detected 282 (sensibility 98.6% and specificity 96.6%); the urease test 276 (sensibility 96.5% and specificity 98.6%) and culture was positive in 255 samples (sensibility 89.2% and specificity 100.0%). These results show that both the Gram stain and Urease test are useful for diagnosing H. pylori infection due to their high sensitivity and specificity, rapidness, low cost for the Gram stain, and easy interpretation for Urease test. Culture, even though less sensitivity++, represents the most unquestionable diagnosis and permits carrying out susceptibility to antimicrobials tests.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[幽门螺杆菌感染诊断方法评价]。
未标示:幽门螺杆菌是一种革兰氏阴性弯曲杆菌,被认为是慢性胃炎的病原,也是十二指肠溃疡和胃癌发生的重要因素。本研究的目的是评估三种诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的微生物学方法。我们研究了218名患者的375份样本,这些患者在Vargas医院消化内科就诊,是内窥镜检查的候选人。在胃窦水平取胃粘膜组织标本,革兰氏染色,检测脲酶并培养。结果:胃镜检查十二指肠溃疡123例(91.1%),胃溃疡17例(76.5%),胃炎和/或十二指肠炎40例(60.0%),十二指肠溃疡合并胃炎1例(100.0%),内镜检查正常37例(56.8%)。通过对三种方法的评价,我们发现286份幽门螺杆菌阳性标本中,革兰氏染色检出282份(敏感性98.6%,特异性96.6%);脲酶试验276例(敏感性96.5%,特异性98.6%)和培养255例(敏感性89.2%,特异性100.0%)呈阳性。结果表明,革兰氏染色法和脲酶试验均具有敏感性高、特异性强、快速、成本低、脲酶试验易于解释等优点,可用于诊断幽门螺杆菌感染。培养虽然敏感性较低,但代表了最不容置疑的诊断,并允许对抗菌素进行敏感性测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatitis C virus]. [Evaluation of methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection]. [Leptospirosis in Gastroenterology. Study of 14 cases in the Hospital Universitário de Caracas 1984-1994]. [Gastrointestinal stromal sarcoma. Report of a case and review of the literature]. [Von Recklinghausen disease and hepatic neurofibromatosis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1