[Breech presentation--information, anxiety and expectations of established obstetricians and pregnant patients. 1: Results of a survey of established obstetricians].

M Krause, T Fischer, A Feige
{"title":"[Breech presentation--information, anxiety and expectations of established obstetricians and pregnant patients. 1: Results of a survey of established obstetricians].","authors":"M Krause,&nbsp;T Fischer,&nbsp;A Feige","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a anonymous questionnaire we studied the advise of gynecologists to breech presented pregnant women in the area around Nürnberg-Fürth-Erlangen in Germany. 61.5% of gynecologists participated the study, 71.2% of them (n = 57) prefer primary caesarean section in primapara. 13.8% (n = 11) of the questioned doctors favour a vaginally delivery procedure. Advise to multiparas for primarous caesarean section was given in 8.8% (n = 7) and for vaginally delivery mode in 80.0% (n = 64). Reasons for caesarean section was a decreased fetal delivery risk (90%, n = 72) and the possibility of prospective delivery planing (26.3%, n = 21). Other reasons were various obstetrical risk factors and forensic aspects. Benefits of vaginally delivery mode in multiparas was a low fetal delivery risk (72.5%, n = 58) and a low maternal morbidity (66.3%, n = 53). Results of actual studies are suggesting, that there is a controlled fetal risk of vaginally delivery mode in breech presented labour. According to these studies a change of labour procedure is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a anonymous questionnaire we studied the advise of gynecologists to breech presented pregnant women in the area around Nürnberg-Fürth-Erlangen in Germany. 61.5% of gynecologists participated the study, 71.2% of them (n = 57) prefer primary caesarean section in primapara. 13.8% (n = 11) of the questioned doctors favour a vaginally delivery procedure. Advise to multiparas for primarous caesarean section was given in 8.8% (n = 7) and for vaginally delivery mode in 80.0% (n = 64). Reasons for caesarean section was a decreased fetal delivery risk (90%, n = 72) and the possibility of prospective delivery planing (26.3%, n = 21). Other reasons were various obstetrical risk factors and forensic aspects. Benefits of vaginally delivery mode in multiparas was a low fetal delivery risk (72.5%, n = 58) and a low maternal morbidity (66.3%, n = 53). Results of actual studies are suggesting, that there is a controlled fetal risk of vaginally delivery mode in breech presented labour. According to these studies a change of labour procedure is essential.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【臀位介绍——妇产科医生和孕妇的信息、焦虑和期望。】[参考译文]:一项对妇产科医生的调查结果。
通过匿名问卷调查,我们研究了德国n rnberg- f - rth- erlangen附近地区妇科医生对孕妇的臀位建议。61.5%的妇科医生参与了这项研究,其中71.2% (n = 57)的妇科医生倾向于在妊娠期进行初次剖腹产。13.8% (n = 11)的受访医生赞成顺产。建议多产妇进行初次剖宫产的占8.8% (n = 7),建议顺产的占80.0% (n = 64)。剖腹产的原因是降低胎儿分娩风险(90%,n = 72)和预期分娩计划的可能性(26.3%,n = 21)。其他原因是各种产科风险因素和法医方面。多产妇顺产方式的好处是低胎儿分娩风险(72.5%,n = 58)和低产妇发病率(66.3%,n = 53)。实际的研究结果表明,有一个控制胎儿风险的阴道分娩方式在臀位分娩。根据这些研究,改变分娩程序是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Symposium on Uterine Contraction and Beginning of Labor. Aachen, September 1993]. [Uterine contraction and labor onset. Overview]. [Control of labor onset in the human]. [Biochemical principles of cervix ripening and dilatation]. [Role of the cervix uteri at labor onset from ultrasound studies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1