[Aluminum poisoning in dialysis patients--diagnosis and therapy].

U Vogelsang
{"title":"[Aluminum poisoning in dialysis patients--diagnosis and therapy].","authors":"U Vogelsang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three different dialysis procedures have been investigated and compared with respect to the efficacy of aluminium elimination in intoxicated dialysis patients. For this purpose ten patients with increased serum aluminium have been treated for two months with the chelator DFO. The effect of DFO on the aluminium clearance has been investigated. In spite of difficult conditions during studies due to an unexpected cumulation of severe adverse effects of DFO, some statements given here may be of value for the care of hemodialysis patients: 1. Both, the commonly used cuprophan filters as well as the newer highly permeable dialysis membranes like the polysulfone membrane used in our study, permit a steady but low elimination of aluminium during a dialysis session without significant difference in efficacy. A prerequisite, however, is a very low level of aluminium in the dialysate. 2. DFO induces a dose-dependent mobilization of aluminium accumulated in the tissue. The level of plasma aluminium increases distinctly, dialysable aluminium-DFO complexes are produced, and marked amounts of aluminium can thus be eliminated by the use of DFO. 3. IF DFO is used, even the economical cuprophan membrane CF1511 may lead to a satisfactory elimination rate of aluminium. Equal increase of elimination rate is achieved whether the Cuprophan membrane CF1511 is combined with the hemoperfusion filter Alukart or the highly permeable polysulfone membrane F60 is used alone. This is of importance particularly in cases of severe intoxication with aluminium. The polysulfon dialysator may be preferred to conventional membranes combined with hemoperfusion because of the simpler handling. 4. In order to prevent accumulation of aluminium in dialysis patients, besides the use of dialysates poor in aluminium, phosphate binders containing aluminium should be avoided completely if possible. They may be replaced by the two phosphate binders calcium carbonate and calcium acetate and a diet poor in phosphates. The use of aluminium-containing phosphate-binders should be restricted to exceptional cases such as patients with hypercalcemia, severe intolerance of calcium-containing phosphate-binders or patients with hyperphosphatemia that cannot be treated otherwise. 5. Finally, regular controls of plasma aluminium levels are mandatory in dialysed patients. In cases with an increase over 50 micrograms/l and positive DFO test, DFO treatment should be initiated. Low doses of 10 mg/kg body weight DFO per week are actually in use for those cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":21438,"journal":{"name":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","volume":"83 24","pages":"738-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis = Revue suisse de medecine Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three different dialysis procedures have been investigated and compared with respect to the efficacy of aluminium elimination in intoxicated dialysis patients. For this purpose ten patients with increased serum aluminium have been treated for two months with the chelator DFO. The effect of DFO on the aluminium clearance has been investigated. In spite of difficult conditions during studies due to an unexpected cumulation of severe adverse effects of DFO, some statements given here may be of value for the care of hemodialysis patients: 1. Both, the commonly used cuprophan filters as well as the newer highly permeable dialysis membranes like the polysulfone membrane used in our study, permit a steady but low elimination of aluminium during a dialysis session without significant difference in efficacy. A prerequisite, however, is a very low level of aluminium in the dialysate. 2. DFO induces a dose-dependent mobilization of aluminium accumulated in the tissue. The level of plasma aluminium increases distinctly, dialysable aluminium-DFO complexes are produced, and marked amounts of aluminium can thus be eliminated by the use of DFO. 3. IF DFO is used, even the economical cuprophan membrane CF1511 may lead to a satisfactory elimination rate of aluminium. Equal increase of elimination rate is achieved whether the Cuprophan membrane CF1511 is combined with the hemoperfusion filter Alukart or the highly permeable polysulfone membrane F60 is used alone. This is of importance particularly in cases of severe intoxication with aluminium. The polysulfon dialysator may be preferred to conventional membranes combined with hemoperfusion because of the simpler handling. 4. In order to prevent accumulation of aluminium in dialysis patients, besides the use of dialysates poor in aluminium, phosphate binders containing aluminium should be avoided completely if possible. They may be replaced by the two phosphate binders calcium carbonate and calcium acetate and a diet poor in phosphates. The use of aluminium-containing phosphate-binders should be restricted to exceptional cases such as patients with hypercalcemia, severe intolerance of calcium-containing phosphate-binders or patients with hyperphosphatemia that cannot be treated otherwise. 5. Finally, regular controls of plasma aluminium levels are mandatory in dialysed patients. In cases with an increase over 50 micrograms/l and positive DFO test, DFO treatment should be initiated. Low doses of 10 mg/kg body weight DFO per week are actually in use for those cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【透析患者铝中毒的诊断与治疗】。
已经调查了三种不同的透析程序,并比较了中毒透析患者消除铝的功效。为此目的,10例血清铝升高的患者用螯合剂DFO治疗了两个月。研究了DFO对铝间隙的影响。尽管由于DFO的严重不良反应的意想不到的累积,研究过程中条件困难,但这里给出的一些陈述可能对血液透析患者的护理有价值:常用的cuphaan过滤器和较新的高渗透性透析膜(如我们研究中使用的聚砜膜)都可以在透析期间稳定但低水平地消除铝,而效果没有显着差异。然而,一个先决条件是透析液中铝的含量很低。2. DFO诱导组织中积累的铝的剂量依赖性动员。血浆铝的水平明显增加,产生可透析的铝-DFO络合物,因此使用DFO可以消除显著数量的铝。3.如果使用DFO,即使是经济的cuphaan膜CF1511也可以达到令人满意的铝去除率。cuprofan膜CF1511与血液灌注过滤器Alukart联合使用,与高透性聚砜膜F60单独使用,去除率均有相同的提高。这在铝严重中毒的情况下尤其重要。由于操作简单,聚砜透析器可能比常规膜结合血液灌流更优选。4. 为了防止透析患者体内铝的积累,除了使用含铝差的透析液外,如果可能的话,应完全避免使用含铝的磷酸盐结合剂。它们可以被两种磷酸盐粘合剂碳酸钙和醋酸钙以及低磷酸盐饮食所取代。含铝磷酸盐结合剂的使用应限制在特殊情况下,如高钙血症患者、含钙磷酸盐结合剂严重不耐受患者或无法治疗的高磷血症患者。5. 最后,透析患者必须定期控制血浆铝水平。如果增加超过50微克/升,DFO检测呈阳性,则应开始DFO治疗。对于这些病例,实际使用的是每周10毫克/公斤体重的低剂量DFO。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Interventional cardiology]. [Pallor]. [Leukopenia]. [In Process Citation] [What is your diagnosis? Henoch-Schoenlein rheumatoid purpura].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1