Ingo Rentschler , Bernhard Treutwein , Theodor Landis
{"title":"Dissociation of local and global processing in visual agnosia","authors":"Ingo Rentschler , Bernhard Treutwein , Theodor Landis","doi":"10.1016/0042-6989(94)90045-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subsequent to strokes in the right and left inferomedial occipito-temporal lobes, two patients became prosopagnosic and alexic, respectively. They also show a complementary dissociation of the analysis of handwritten text. The patient with the right posterior stroke can read it but not recognize whose handwriting it is; the patient with the left posterior stroke cannot read the text but knows who wrote it. The analysis of spatial vision revealed that the prosopagnosic patient has no problem with seeing texture elements when presented in isolation. Yet she performs poorly with Moiréand texture perception, i.e. she suffers from a selective loss of <em>global</em> visual perception. The alexic patient performs well with Moirépatterns but neither with (complex) texture elements nor with textures. She seemingly can locally <em>and</em> globally process patterns composed of simple figural elements but fails with stimuli that require the integration of features. This finding of a concomitant dissociation of local and global visual processes in the two patients supports the view that prosopagnosia as well as alexia are the most conspicuous aspects of more general alterations of visual perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"34 7","pages":"Pages 963-971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"1994-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0042-6989(94)90045-0","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0042698994900450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2003/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39
Abstract
Subsequent to strokes in the right and left inferomedial occipito-temporal lobes, two patients became prosopagnosic and alexic, respectively. They also show a complementary dissociation of the analysis of handwritten text. The patient with the right posterior stroke can read it but not recognize whose handwriting it is; the patient with the left posterior stroke cannot read the text but knows who wrote it. The analysis of spatial vision revealed that the prosopagnosic patient has no problem with seeing texture elements when presented in isolation. Yet she performs poorly with Moiréand texture perception, i.e. she suffers from a selective loss of global visual perception. The alexic patient performs well with Moirépatterns but neither with (complex) texture elements nor with textures. She seemingly can locally and globally process patterns composed of simple figural elements but fails with stimuli that require the integration of features. This finding of a concomitant dissociation of local and global visual processes in the two patients supports the view that prosopagnosia as well as alexia are the most conspicuous aspects of more general alterations of visual perception.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.