[Ultrasonographic determination of amniotic fluid--comparison of two methods].

C Wurl, J W Dudenhausen
{"title":"[Ultrasonographic determination of amniotic fluid--comparison of two methods].","authors":"C Wurl,&nbsp;J W Dudenhausen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was performed in order to find a suitable ultrasonographic method of determining amniotic fluid volumes. Volumes were measured in 398 gravidae with no fetal or maternal pathology. The Depot V method described by Chamberlain et al. and Phelan et al.'s four-quadrant method were used to perform the measurements. Normal-value curves were prepared from the results. The reproducibility of the two methods was also verified. The results of the study showed that the normal-value curve derived from the four-quadrant method was in very good agreement with the results of the quantitative indicator dilution methods described by Queenan et al., which also indicated a marked decrease in volume after GW 34. It may be concluded from this that the four-quadrant method produces representative figures for the actual volume of amniotic fluid. A further distinctive feature of the four-quadrant methods is its very good reproducibility. The decrease in the fluid volume towards the end of gestation could not be demonstrated by the Depot V method. The four-quadrant method may therefore be regarded as a suitable semi-quantitative ultrasonographic method of determining the amniotic fluid volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":23919,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Perinatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was performed in order to find a suitable ultrasonographic method of determining amniotic fluid volumes. Volumes were measured in 398 gravidae with no fetal or maternal pathology. The Depot V method described by Chamberlain et al. and Phelan et al.'s four-quadrant method were used to perform the measurements. Normal-value curves were prepared from the results. The reproducibility of the two methods was also verified. The results of the study showed that the normal-value curve derived from the four-quadrant method was in very good agreement with the results of the quantitative indicator dilution methods described by Queenan et al., which also indicated a marked decrease in volume after GW 34. It may be concluded from this that the four-quadrant method produces representative figures for the actual volume of amniotic fluid. A further distinctive feature of the four-quadrant methods is its very good reproducibility. The decrease in the fluid volume towards the end of gestation could not be demonstrated by the Depot V method. The four-quadrant method may therefore be regarded as a suitable semi-quantitative ultrasonographic method of determining the amniotic fluid volume.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声检测羊水——两种方法的比较
为了找到一种合适的超声检查羊水容量的方法,进行了一项研究。测量了398例没有胎儿或母体病理的孕妇的体积。采用Chamberlain等人描述的Depot V法和Phelan等人的四象限法进行测量。根据结果绘制正态值曲线。验证了两种方法的重复性。研究结果表明,四象限法得出的正态值曲线与Queenan等人描述的定量指标稀释法的结果非常吻合,也表明GW 34后体积明显减少。由此可以得出结论,四象限法产生的羊水实际体积的代表性数字。四象限法的另一个显著特征是其非常好的再现性。妊娠末期液体体积的减少不能用Depot V法来证明。因此,四象限法可视为确定羊水体积的一种合适的半定量超声方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Symposium on Uterine Contraction and Beginning of Labor. Aachen, September 1993]. [Uterine contraction and labor onset. Overview]. [Control of labor onset in the human]. [Biochemical principles of cervix ripening and dilatation]. [Role of the cervix uteri at labor onset from ultrasound studies].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1