Maxilla vs mandible: why use HA?

R M Meffert
{"title":"Maxilla vs mandible: why use HA?","authors":"R M Meffert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various studies have shown that noncoated, metallic screw-type implants have been highly successful in types 1, 2, and 3 bone. However, in type 4 bone, such as that found in the maxilla, these implants have not been as successful. In the maxilla, HA-coated implants have shown better results than noncoated implants, particularly with regard to bone-to-implant contact, shear strength, and fixation. The author therefore concludes that the HA-coated implant may have better long-term success when shorter implants are needed, and when treating patients with poor, low density, and cancellous bone.</p>","PeriodicalId":77696,"journal":{"name":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"S533-8; quiz S565-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various studies have shown that noncoated, metallic screw-type implants have been highly successful in types 1, 2, and 3 bone. However, in type 4 bone, such as that found in the maxilla, these implants have not been as successful. In the maxilla, HA-coated implants have shown better results than noncoated implants, particularly with regard to bone-to-implant contact, shear strength, and fixation. The author therefore concludes that the HA-coated implant may have better long-term success when shorter implants are needed, and when treating patients with poor, low density, and cancellous bone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上颌骨vs下颌骨:为什么使用HA?
各种研究表明,非涂层的金属螺钉型种植体在1型、2型和3型骨中非常成功。然而,在4型骨中,比如在上颌骨中发现的,这些植入物就不那么成功了。在上颌骨,ha涂层种植体比非涂层种植体表现出更好的效果,特别是在骨与种植体接触、剪切强度和固定方面。因此,作者得出结论,当需要较短的种植体时,以及治疗骨质不良、低密度和松质骨的患者时,ha涂层种植体可能具有更好的长期成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implications of periodontal microbiology for the treatment of periodontal infections. Periodontal complications of HIV infection. Enhancing cosmetics through regenerative periodontal procedures. Ridge augmentation in preparation for conventional and implant-supported restorations. Chlorhexidine gluconate in periodontal treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1