In vitro activity of readily available household materials against HIV-1: is bleach enough?

N Flynn, S Jain, E M Keddie, J R Carlson, M B Jennings, H W Haverkos, N Nassar, R Anderson, S Cohen, D Goldberg
{"title":"In vitro activity of readily available household materials against HIV-1: is bleach enough?","authors":"N Flynn,&nbsp;S Jain,&nbsp;E M Keddie,&nbsp;J R Carlson,&nbsp;M B Jennings,&nbsp;H W Haverkos,&nbsp;N Nassar,&nbsp;R Anderson,&nbsp;S Cohen,&nbsp;D Goldberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report describes experiments assessing the effectiveness against HIV of potential disinfecting agents that are commonly available to IDU when they are sharing syringes. We exposed cell-free HIV, HIV-infected cells, and HIV-infected blood containing known quantities of HIV to household cleaning agents, alcohols, peroxide, and highly acidic materials for 1 min, in order to examine the effects of these materials on the infectivity of the HIV. Undiluted liquid laundry bleach and dilute liquid dish detergent reduced the number of culturable HIV to an undetectable level under the experimental conditions used. Diluted bleach was not completely effective. Other potential disinfecting agents, including ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and hydrogen peroxide, were unable to disinfect high numbers of HIV-infected cells or infected blood. Liquid dish detergent warrants further study as a possible acceptable alternative to bleach. Our data provide support for recommendations to IDU that they disinfect shared syringes every time between users with full-strength liquid laundry bleach to reduce their risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV. When bleach is not available, liquid dish detergent or other available disinfecting agents such as rubbing alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, or high alcohol content beverages are more effective than water at disinfecting HIV, recognizing that these materials are less effective than bleach. Although these materials are effective, they should not be viewed as a substitute for decreased sharing of injection equipment by IDU, or increased availability of sterile needles and syringes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes","volume":"7 7","pages":"747-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report describes experiments assessing the effectiveness against HIV of potential disinfecting agents that are commonly available to IDU when they are sharing syringes. We exposed cell-free HIV, HIV-infected cells, and HIV-infected blood containing known quantities of HIV to household cleaning agents, alcohols, peroxide, and highly acidic materials for 1 min, in order to examine the effects of these materials on the infectivity of the HIV. Undiluted liquid laundry bleach and dilute liquid dish detergent reduced the number of culturable HIV to an undetectable level under the experimental conditions used. Diluted bleach was not completely effective. Other potential disinfecting agents, including ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, and hydrogen peroxide, were unable to disinfect high numbers of HIV-infected cells or infected blood. Liquid dish detergent warrants further study as a possible acceptable alternative to bleach. Our data provide support for recommendations to IDU that they disinfect shared syringes every time between users with full-strength liquid laundry bleach to reduce their risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV. When bleach is not available, liquid dish detergent or other available disinfecting agents such as rubbing alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, or high alcohol content beverages are more effective than water at disinfecting HIV, recognizing that these materials are less effective than bleach. Although these materials are effective, they should not be viewed as a substitute for decreased sharing of injection equipment by IDU, or increased availability of sterile needles and syringes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现成的家庭用品对HIV-1的体外活性:漂白剂够吗?
本报告描述了评估注射吸毒者共用注射器时常用的潜在消毒剂对艾滋病毒的有效性的实验。我们将无细胞HIV、HIV感染细胞和含有已知数量HIV的HIV感染血液暴露于家用清洁剂、酒精、过氧化物和高酸性物质中1分钟,以检验这些物质对HIV传染性的影响。在实验条件下,未稀释的液体洗衣漂白剂和稀释的液体洗洁精将可培养的艾滋病毒数量减少到无法检测的水平。稀释过的漂白剂并不是完全有效。其他可能的消毒剂,包括乙醇、异丙醇和过氧化氢,都不能消毒大量感染hiv的细胞或感染的血液。液体洗洁精作为漂白剂的可能替代品值得进一步研究。我们的数据支持向IDU提出的建议,即每次使用全强度洗衣液漂白剂对使用者共用的注射器进行消毒,以降低他们感染或传播艾滋病毒的风险。在没有漂白剂的情况下,液体洗涤剂或其他可用的消毒剂,如外用酒精、过氧化氢或高酒精含量的饮料,在消毒艾滋病毒方面比水更有效,要认识到这些材料的效果不如漂白剂。虽然这些材料是有效的,但它们不应被视为可以替代IDU减少共用注射设备,或增加无菌针头和注射器的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Host Nuclear Genome Copy Number Variations Identify High-Risk Anal Precancers in People Living with HIV. Impact of COVID-19 on People Living with HIV: Data from Five Medical Monitoring Project Sites, 2020-2022. HIV-exposed, uninfected infants in Uganda experience poorer growth and body composition trajectories than HIV-unexposed infants. Absence of GVH diseases in AIDS. Thrush and fever as measures of immunocompetence in HIV-1-infected men.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1