Two approaches to reading instruction with children with disabilities: does program design make a difference?

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptional Children Pub Date : 1993-02-01 DOI:10.1177/001440299305900404
R E O'Connor, J R Jenkins, K N Cole, P E Mills
{"title":"Two approaches to reading instruction with children with disabilities: does program design make a difference?","authors":"R E O'Connor,&nbsp;J R Jenkins,&nbsp;K N Cole,&nbsp;P E Mills","doi":"10.1177/001440299305900404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effects on reading achievement of variation in program design and tested the hypothesis this Distar Reading Mastery's (Engelmann & Bruner, 1988b) demonstrated effects with disadvantaged children in Project Follow Through can be generalized to children with disabilities. We compared the effects of two synthetic phonics reading programs, Direct Instruction (DI) Reading Mastery I and II and Addison Wesley's Meet the Superkids and The Superkids' Club, (Rowland, 1982a, 1982b) for 81 children in transitional kindergarten special education classes. No significant achievement differences were evident for the instructional program either at the end of the treatment year, or on follow-up testing 1 year later. However, among children who made advanced progress, the DI group showed larger reading gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"59 4","pages":"312-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"1993-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440299305900404","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299305900404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This study examined the effects on reading achievement of variation in program design and tested the hypothesis this Distar Reading Mastery's (Engelmann & Bruner, 1988b) demonstrated effects with disadvantaged children in Project Follow Through can be generalized to children with disabilities. We compared the effects of two synthetic phonics reading programs, Direct Instruction (DI) Reading Mastery I and II and Addison Wesley's Meet the Superkids and The Superkids' Club, (Rowland, 1982a, 1982b) for 81 children in transitional kindergarten special education classes. No significant achievement differences were evident for the instructional program either at the end of the treatment year, or on follow-up testing 1 year later. However, among children who made advanced progress, the DI group showed larger reading gains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对残疾儿童进行阅读教学的两种方法:项目设计有影响吗?
本研究考察了项目设计变化对阅读成绩的影响,并检验了Distar reading Mastery (Engelmann & Bruner, 1988b)对弱势儿童的影响可以推广到残疾儿童的假设。我们对81名过渡幼儿园特殊教育班的儿童进行了两种综合自然拼读方案的效果进行了比较,即直接指导(DI)阅读掌握I和II和Addison Wesley's Meet the Superkids and the Superkids' Club (Rowland, 1982a, 1982b)。无论是在治疗年结束时,还是在1年后的随访测试中,教学计划都没有明显的成就差异。然而,在取得进步的孩子中,DI组的阅读能力有了更大的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
期刊最新文献
Factors Predicting Sustained Implementation of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Who Are We Measuring? Teacher Effects in Gifted and Talented Teacher Rating Scales Situating Ourselves in Coalitions With and for Exceptional Children: Editors’ Introduction Differences in Loneliness Experiences Among High-Ability Students: Individual and Social Context Predictors Single-Case Effect Size Distributions for Interventions Designed to Improve Engagement in Elementary Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1