Evaluation of a purification procedure for the muscarinic receptor for the purpose of quantitative receptor assays of anticholinergics. Part A: The membrane-bound receptor.
{"title":"Evaluation of a purification procedure for the muscarinic receptor for the purpose of quantitative receptor assays of anticholinergics. Part A: The membrane-bound receptor.","authors":"J Smisterová, K Ensing, R A de Zeeuw","doi":"10.1080/10826069508010121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presented purification procedure for the muscarinic receptor from calf striatum includes the extraction of lipids with hexane in the first step and the removal of 39% of non-receptor proteins with 2 M NaCl in the second step. The simplicity of such an approach to the purification of the receptor warrants its use in the routine practice for quantitative purposes. The high affinity binding of tertiary 3H-dexetimide (3H-DEX) and quaternary 3H-N-methylscopolamine (3H-NMS) is preserved after the removal of irrelevant lipids and proteins from the P2-pellet. The overall yield of receptors--80%, when labelled with 3H-NMS, was satisfactory. Moreover, the final product, the NaCl-pellet, exerts a higher density of 3H-NMS binding sites per mg proteins by a factor of about 1.7. The overall yield of receptors and purification factor were lower, when measured with 3H-DEX. The total yield of 3H-DEX binding sites amounted to about 40% and the receptor density per mg protein decreased by a factor of 0.85. We did not succeed in the improvement of the ratio specific/non-specific binding, neither for 3H-DEX nor for 3H-NMS for the purified receptor preparations. The use of 3H-NMS is preferable to 3H-DEX in plasma sample assays because of a negligible effect of plasma on ligand binding when compared with 3H-DEX.</p>","PeriodicalId":20391,"journal":{"name":"Preparative biochemistry","volume":"25 4","pages":"197-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10826069508010121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preparative biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826069508010121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The presented purification procedure for the muscarinic receptor from calf striatum includes the extraction of lipids with hexane in the first step and the removal of 39% of non-receptor proteins with 2 M NaCl in the second step. The simplicity of such an approach to the purification of the receptor warrants its use in the routine practice for quantitative purposes. The high affinity binding of tertiary 3H-dexetimide (3H-DEX) and quaternary 3H-N-methylscopolamine (3H-NMS) is preserved after the removal of irrelevant lipids and proteins from the P2-pellet. The overall yield of receptors--80%, when labelled with 3H-NMS, was satisfactory. Moreover, the final product, the NaCl-pellet, exerts a higher density of 3H-NMS binding sites per mg proteins by a factor of about 1.7. The overall yield of receptors and purification factor were lower, when measured with 3H-DEX. The total yield of 3H-DEX binding sites amounted to about 40% and the receptor density per mg protein decreased by a factor of 0.85. We did not succeed in the improvement of the ratio specific/non-specific binding, neither for 3H-DEX nor for 3H-NMS for the purified receptor preparations. The use of 3H-NMS is preferable to 3H-DEX in plasma sample assays because of a negligible effect of plasma on ligand binding when compared with 3H-DEX.
本文提出的小牛纹状体毒蕈碱受体的纯化工艺包括第一步用己烷提取脂质,第二步用2 M NaCl去除39%的非受体蛋白。这种纯化受体的方法的简单性保证了它在定量目的的常规实践中使用。去除p2颗粒中不相关的脂质和蛋白质后,叔3h -右塞米特(3H-DEX)和季3h - n -甲基东莨菪碱(3H-NMS)的高亲和力结合得到保留。当用3H-NMS标记时,受体的总收率为80%,令人满意。此外,最终产物氯化钠颗粒每毫克蛋白质的3H-NMS结合位点密度约为1.7倍。当用3H-DEX测定时,受体的总收率和纯化因子较低。3H-DEX结合位点的总收率约为40%,每mg蛋白的受体密度降低了0.85倍。我们没有成功地改善3H-DEX和3H-NMS纯化受体制剂的特异性/非特异性结合比率。在血浆样品分析中使用3H-NMS优于3H-DEX,因为与3H-DEX相比,血浆对配体结合的影响可以忽略不计。