Limited applicability of the DATEX Reloxograph in diabetics with peripheral polyneuropathy.

D Knüttgen, W Burgwinkel, K Z Nieden, M Jahn, M R Müller-Gorges, M Doehn
{"title":"Limited applicability of the DATEX Reloxograph in diabetics with peripheral polyneuropathy.","authors":"D Knüttgen,&nbsp;W Burgwinkel,&nbsp;K Z Nieden,&nbsp;M Jahn,&nbsp;M R Müller-Gorges,&nbsp;M Doehn","doi":"10.1007/BF02918208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to investigate whether peripheral nerve dysfunction can influence the applicability of the DATEX Relaxograph in diabetics. Sixty two patients (43 diabetics, 19 non-diabetics) undergoing ophthalmosurgical procedures under general anesthesia were tested. The distal motor latency (DML) of the ulnar nerve served as a graduation tool for peripheral nerve dysfunction. The patients were divided in three groups: non-diabetics (group 1), diabetics with DML < 3.8 msec (group 2), diabetics with DML > 3.8 msec (group 3). Relaxometry was performed by stimulating the right ulnar nerve near the wrist, and the evoked response (EMG) was obtained from the hypothenar muscle. Calibration of the device (i.e. supramaximal stimulation within the given current range of a maximum of 70 mA) was carried out successfully in most patients of group 1 and 2 (94.7% and 85.7% respectively). In contrast to that calibration could be carried out in only 40.9% of the patients of group 3 (P < 0.01 vs. group 1 and 2). Consequently in a high percentage (59.1%) of the patients of group 3 relaxometry had to be performed in an uncalibrated manner. The results substantiate the hypothesis that peripheral nerve dysfunction can restrict the applicability of the Relaxograph in diabetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"13 1","pages":"21-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02918208","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02918208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate whether peripheral nerve dysfunction can influence the applicability of the DATEX Relaxograph in diabetics. Sixty two patients (43 diabetics, 19 non-diabetics) undergoing ophthalmosurgical procedures under general anesthesia were tested. The distal motor latency (DML) of the ulnar nerve served as a graduation tool for peripheral nerve dysfunction. The patients were divided in three groups: non-diabetics (group 1), diabetics with DML < 3.8 msec (group 2), diabetics with DML > 3.8 msec (group 3). Relaxometry was performed by stimulating the right ulnar nerve near the wrist, and the evoked response (EMG) was obtained from the hypothenar muscle. Calibration of the device (i.e. supramaximal stimulation within the given current range of a maximum of 70 mA) was carried out successfully in most patients of group 1 and 2 (94.7% and 85.7% respectively). In contrast to that calibration could be carried out in only 40.9% of the patients of group 3 (P < 0.01 vs. group 1 and 2). Consequently in a high percentage (59.1%) of the patients of group 3 relaxometry had to be performed in an uncalibrated manner. The results substantiate the hypothesis that peripheral nerve dysfunction can restrict the applicability of the Relaxograph in diabetics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DATEX Reloxograph在伴有周围多发性神经病变的糖尿病患者中的有限适用性。
本研究的目的是探讨周围神经功能障碍是否会影响DATEX松弛仪在糖尿病患者中的适用性。本文对62例患者(糖尿病43例,非糖尿病19例)在全身麻醉下进行眼科手术。尺神经远端运动潜伏期(DML)可作为周围神经功能障碍的分级工具。将患者分为3组:非糖尿病患者(1组)、DML < 3.8 msec的糖尿病患者(2组)、DML > 3.8 msec的糖尿病患者(3组)。通过刺激腕部附近的右侧尺神经进行松弛测量,并从鱼际下肌获得诱发反应(EMG)。第1组和第2组的大多数患者(分别为94.7%和85.7%)成功地进行了设备校准(即在最大70 mA的给定电流范围内进行超极大刺激)。相比之下,第3组只有40.9%的患者可以进行校准(P < 0.01,与第1组和第2组相比)。因此,第3组有很高比例(59.1%)的患者必须以未校准的方式进行舒张测量。结果证实了周围神经功能障碍可能限制舒张仪在糖尿病患者中的适用性的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WCALive: broadcasting a major medical conference on the Internet. The inspiratory to end-tidal oxygen difference during exercise. Design and implementation of a PC-based data acquisition system for measuring ECG and respiratory signals. Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1