Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia.

G R Manecke, J P Dilger, L J Kutner, P J Poppers
{"title":"Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia.","authors":"G R Manecke,&nbsp;J P Dilger,&nbsp;L J Kutner,&nbsp;P J Poppers","doi":"10.1007/BF03356568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although auscultation is commonly used as a continuous monitoring tool during anesthesia, the breath sounds of anesthetized patients have never been systematically studied. In this investigation we used digital audio technology to record and analyze the breath sounds of 14 healthy adult patients receiving general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation. Sounds recorded from inside the esophagus were compared to those recorded from the surface of the chest, and corresponding airflow was measured with a pneumotachograph. The sound samples associated with inspiratory and expiratory phases were analyzed in the time domain (RMS amplitude) and frequency domain (peak frequency, spectral edge, and power ratios). There was a positive linear correlation (R2 > 0.9) between inspiratory flow and sound amplitude in the precordial and esophageal samples of all patients. The RMS amplitude of the inspiratory and expiratory sounds was approximately 13 times greater when recorded from inside the esophagus than from the surface of the chest in all patients at all flows (p < 0.001). The peak frequency (Hz) was significantly higher in the esophageal recordings than the precordial samples (298 +/- 9 vs 181 +/- 10, P < 0.0001), as was the 97% spectral edge (Hz) (740 +/- 7 vs 348 +/- 16, P < 0.0001). In the adult population esophageal stethoscopes yield higher frequencies and greater amplitude than precordial stethoscopes. Quantification of lung sounds may provide for improved monitoring and diagnostic capability during anesthesia and surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"14 4","pages":"231-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03356568","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Although auscultation is commonly used as a continuous monitoring tool during anesthesia, the breath sounds of anesthetized patients have never been systematically studied. In this investigation we used digital audio technology to record and analyze the breath sounds of 14 healthy adult patients receiving general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation. Sounds recorded from inside the esophagus were compared to those recorded from the surface of the chest, and corresponding airflow was measured with a pneumotachograph. The sound samples associated with inspiratory and expiratory phases were analyzed in the time domain (RMS amplitude) and frequency domain (peak frequency, spectral edge, and power ratios). There was a positive linear correlation (R2 > 0.9) between inspiratory flow and sound amplitude in the precordial and esophageal samples of all patients. The RMS amplitude of the inspiratory and expiratory sounds was approximately 13 times greater when recorded from inside the esophagus than from the surface of the chest in all patients at all flows (p < 0.001). The peak frequency (Hz) was significantly higher in the esophageal recordings than the precordial samples (298 +/- 9 vs 181 +/- 10, P < 0.0001), as was the 97% spectral edge (Hz) (740 +/- 7 vs 348 +/- 16, P < 0.0001). In the adult population esophageal stethoscopes yield higher frequencies and greater amplitude than precordial stethoscopes. Quantification of lung sounds may provide for improved monitoring and diagnostic capability during anesthesia and surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听诊重访:全身麻醉时呼吸音的波形和频谱特征。
虽然听诊是麻醉过程中常用的连续监测工具,但麻醉患者的呼吸音从未被系统地研究过。在本研究中,我们使用数字音频技术记录并分析了14例健康成人全身麻醉正压通气患者的呼吸音。将从食道内记录的声音与从胸部表面记录的声音进行比较,并用气测仪测量相应的气流。在时域(均方根幅值)和频域(峰值频率、谱边和功率比)分析与吸气和呼气相相关的声音样本。所有患者的心前区和食管样本的吸气流量与声幅呈线性正相关(R2 > 0.9)。在所有患者的所有流中,从食道内记录的吸气和呼气声的RMS振幅大约是从胸部表面记录的13倍(p < 0.001)。食道记录的峰值频率(Hz)明显高于心前样本(298 +/- 9 vs 181 +/- 10, P < 0.0001), 97%频谱边缘(Hz) (740 +/- 7 vs 348 +/- 16, P < 0.0001)。在成年人中,食管听诊器比心前听诊器产生更高的频率和更大的振幅。在麻醉和手术过程中,肺音的量化可以提高监测和诊断能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WCALive: broadcasting a major medical conference on the Internet. The inspiratory to end-tidal oxygen difference during exercise. Design and implementation of a PC-based data acquisition system for measuring ECG and respiratory signals. Auscultation revisited: the waveform and spectral characteristics of breath sounds during general anesthesia. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1