[An analysis of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma by systematic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection].

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 1996-07-01
N Tsumura, N Sakuragi, H Hareyama, E Nomura, T Ohkouchi, R Yamamoto, N Takeda, M Nishiya, K Hirahatake, T Fujino, H Okubo, C Satoh, S Makinoda, I Kawaguchi, S Fujimoto
{"title":"[An analysis of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma by systematic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection].","authors":"N Tsumura,&nbsp;N Sakuragi,&nbsp;H Hareyama,&nbsp;E Nomura,&nbsp;T Ohkouchi,&nbsp;R Yamamoto,&nbsp;N Takeda,&nbsp;M Nishiya,&nbsp;K Hirahatake,&nbsp;T Fujino,&nbsp;H Okubo,&nbsp;C Satoh,&nbsp;S Makinoda,&nbsp;I Kawaguchi,&nbsp;S Fujimoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a systematic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) on 137 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma, of whom 97 had undergone RPLND during the primary surgery before chemotherapy and 40 had undergone RPLND during the secondary cytoreductive surgery after preoperative chemotherapy. The tentative staging of the ovarian carcinoma used in this study was determined according to the FIGO criteria without considering the pathologic findings of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Nodal metastasis was seen in 21.9% (30/137) of them. Thirteen had positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) but no positive para-aortic nodes (PAN). Eleven had both positive PLN and positive PAN. Six had positive PAN but no positive PLN. The PAN was the most frequent site of metastasis (17/137). Next were the common iliac, obturator, and lateral group of deep inguinal nodes. Solitary metastasis in the patients who had undergone RPLND during the primary surgery was seen in a PAN and a common iliac node. Among 24 patients with PLN metastasis, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in the number of positive PLN between the patients with PAN metastasis (5.27 +/- 3.00) and the patients without PAN metastasis (2.62 +/- 1.66). These results indicate that the PAN and common iliac nodes are the most important site of nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma. The metastasis to PLN such as obturator node and internal iliac node seems to occur independently of the PAN metastasis, and the PAN metastasis occurs not only through the direct route but also as a consequence of extension of PLN metastases. Systematic retroperitoneal lymph node exploration therefore seems to be necessary to clarify the lymph node status.</p>","PeriodicalId":19498,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"48 7","pages":"508-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a systematic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) on 137 patients with primary ovarian carcinoma, of whom 97 had undergone RPLND during the primary surgery before chemotherapy and 40 had undergone RPLND during the secondary cytoreductive surgery after preoperative chemotherapy. The tentative staging of the ovarian carcinoma used in this study was determined according to the FIGO criteria without considering the pathologic findings of retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Nodal metastasis was seen in 21.9% (30/137) of them. Thirteen had positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) but no positive para-aortic nodes (PAN). Eleven had both positive PLN and positive PAN. Six had positive PAN but no positive PLN. The PAN was the most frequent site of metastasis (17/137). Next were the common iliac, obturator, and lateral group of deep inguinal nodes. Solitary metastasis in the patients who had undergone RPLND during the primary surgery was seen in a PAN and a common iliac node. Among 24 patients with PLN metastasis, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in the number of positive PLN between the patients with PAN metastasis (5.27 +/- 3.00) and the patients without PAN metastasis (2.62 +/- 1.66). These results indicate that the PAN and common iliac nodes are the most important site of nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma. The metastasis to PLN such as obturator node and internal iliac node seems to occur independently of the PAN metastasis, and the PAN metastasis occurs not only through the direct route but also as a consequence of extension of PLN metastases. Systematic retroperitoneal lymph node exploration therefore seems to be necessary to clarify the lymph node status.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[系统腹膜后淋巴结清扫术对卵巢癌盆腔及主动脉旁淋巴结转移的分析]。
我们对137例原发性卵巢癌患者进行了系统的腹膜后淋巴结清扫术(RPLND),其中97例患者在化疗前的一次手术中进行了腹膜后淋巴结清扫术,40例患者在术前化疗后的二次减胞术中进行了腹膜后淋巴结清扫术。本研究中使用的卵巢癌的初步分期是根据FIGO标准确定的,没有考虑腹膜后淋巴结的病理表现。结转移率为21.9%(30/137)。盆腔淋巴结(PLN)阳性13例,主动脉旁淋巴结(PAN)未见阳性。11例PLN和PAN均阳性。6例PAN阳性,无PLN阳性。PAN是最常见的转移部位(17/137)。接下来是髂总淋巴结、闭孔淋巴结和腹股沟深淋巴结外侧组。在初次手术期间接受RPLND的患者中,单发转移见于PAN和髂总结。24例PLN转移患者中,PAN转移患者的PLN阳性数(5.27 +/- 3.00)与未PAN转移患者的PLN阳性数(2.62 +/- 1.66)比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,PAN和髂总淋巴结是卵巢癌最重要的淋巴结转移部位。向闭孔淋巴结和髂内淋巴结等PLN的转移似乎独立于PAN的转移而发生,PAN的转移不仅是通过直接途径发生,而且是PLN转移延伸的结果。因此,系统的腹膜后淋巴结探查似乎是必要的,以澄清淋巴结的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Expression of prolactin receptor gene in human decidua of early pregnancy]. [Studies on protein tyrosine phosphorylation in mouse oocyte maturation]. [Effects of hydrogen peroxide on cellular level of ATP, and relationship between ATP depletion and luteolytic effects in human granulosa luteal cells]. [Findings of uterine sarcoma and uterine myoma by color and power Doppler]. Attempt to continue pregnancy of remaining fetuses after delivery of preceding fetus in multiple pregnancies before 24 weeks gestation: report of three cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1