Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication: analysis of 100 consecutive cases.

M J O'Reilly, S G Mullins, W B Saye, S E Pinto, P T Falkner
{"title":"Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication: analysis of 100 consecutive cases.","authors":"M J O'Reilly,&nbsp;S G Mullins,&nbsp;W B Saye,&nbsp;S E Pinto,&nbsp;P T Falkner","doi":"10.1089/lps.1996.6.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performance of a laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication (LPPF) for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease may have significant advantages. These include a low incidence of postop dysphagia, maintenance of the ability to belch, excellent antireflux effects, and the ease of performance of the surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this antireflux procedure for these advantages to determine both its safety and effectiveness. Over 200 LPPFs have been performed by the authors in a community setting. One hundred consecutive cases are evaluated for indications, preop, and postop studies (EGD, manometry, 24 h pH), time of operation, hospital stay, complications, and conversions to an open procedure. Our technique of LPPF is presented in detail. All patients maintained the ability to belch. Postop dysphagia resolved totally in 4 patients by 7 days. Four pneumothoraces occurred; 1 patient required bilateral chest tube placement. There were no esophageal, stomach, or splenic injuries. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Postop 24 h pH studies revealed resolution of the esophageal reflux. Postop manometric studies show a median increase of 9.2 mm Hg for the LES pressure. No patients have resumed antireflux medication. No short gastric vessels were divided and no esophageal sutures were placed. There were no conversions to a laparotomy. Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication is a safe and effective antireflux procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":77211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery","volume":"6 3","pages":"141-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/lps.1996.6.141","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lps.1996.6.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Performance of a laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication (LPPF) for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease may have significant advantages. These include a low incidence of postop dysphagia, maintenance of the ability to belch, excellent antireflux effects, and the ease of performance of the surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this antireflux procedure for these advantages to determine both its safety and effectiveness. Over 200 LPPFs have been performed by the authors in a community setting. One hundred consecutive cases are evaluated for indications, preop, and postop studies (EGD, manometry, 24 h pH), time of operation, hospital stay, complications, and conversions to an open procedure. Our technique of LPPF is presented in detail. All patients maintained the ability to belch. Postop dysphagia resolved totally in 4 patients by 7 days. Four pneumothoraces occurred; 1 patient required bilateral chest tube placement. There were no esophageal, stomach, or splenic injuries. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days. Postop 24 h pH studies revealed resolution of the esophageal reflux. Postop manometric studies show a median increase of 9.2 mm Hg for the LES pressure. No patients have resumed antireflux medication. No short gastric vessels were divided and no esophageal sutures were placed. There were no conversions to a laparotomy. Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication is a safe and effective antireflux procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜后部分眼底复制术:连续100例分析。
腹腔镜后部分胃底复制术(LPPF)治疗严重胃食管反流疾病可能具有显著的优势。这些优点包括术后吞咽困难的发生率低,打嗝能力的维持,良好的抗反流效果,以及手术的简易性。本研究的目的是评估这种抗反流手术的这些优势,以确定其安全性和有效性。作者在社区环境中进行了200多次lppf。评估100例连续病例的适应症、术前和术后研究(EGD、血压测定、24小时pH值)、手术时间、住院时间、并发症和转向开放式手术。详细介绍了我们的LPPF技术。所有病人都能打嗝。4例患者术后7天吞咽困难完全缓解。发生气胸4例;1例患者需要双侧胸管置入。没有食管、胃或脾损伤。平均住院时间为1.6天。24小时后pH值检测显示食管反流消退。术后测压研究显示,下肢低血压中位数升高9.2毫米汞柱。没有患者恢复抗反流药物治疗。未分离胃短血管,未缝合食管。没有转到剖腹手术。腹腔镜后部分复底术是一种安全有效的抗反流手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Appendectomy The efficacy of epidural anesthesia for endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a prospective study. Results of a prospective multicenter trial evaluating the ePTFE peritoneal onlay laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. Laparoscopic treatment of nonparasitic cysts of spleen and liver. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an institutional setup.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1