The efficacy of epidural anesthesia for endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a prospective study.

D J Azurin, L S Go, J C Cwik, A L Schuricht
{"title":"The efficacy of epidural anesthesia for endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a prospective study.","authors":"D J Azurin,&nbsp;L S Go,&nbsp;J C Cwik,&nbsp;A L Schuricht","doi":"10.1089/lps.1996.6.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been criticized because of the need for general anesthesia. The endoscopic preperitoneal approach allows the use of epidural anesthesia, obviating the potential complications and side effects seen with general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of epidural anesthesia for preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Fifty-two patients underwent repair of a total of 80 hernias over a 6-month period. Thirty-six patients underwent their repairs with the use of epidural anesthesia with the goal of a T-4 sensory level. A tension-free prosthetic repair was performed in all patients. Seventeen patients had unilateral repairs and nineteen had bilateral repairs under epidural, while seven patients had unilateral repairs and nine patients had bilateral repairs under general anesthesia. There were no significant differences in patient demographics. All herniorrhaphies were electively performed on an outpatient basis by a single surgeon (A.L.S.) in a teaching setting. There were no significant differences for unilateral and bilateral repairs when type of anesthesia was compared. There was only one conversion from epidural to general anesthesia, secondary to poor sensory blockade first noticed during creation of the preperitoneal space (97% success rate). Seven patients receiving epidural anesthesia experienced pneumoperitoneum during the procedure. This did not effect the ability to perform the hernia repair successfully. There were no complications related to the epidural anesthetic. Endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy can be performed effectively under epidural anesthesia, obviating the need for general anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":77211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery","volume":"6 6","pages":"369-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/lps.1996.6.369","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lps.1996.6.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has been criticized because of the need for general anesthesia. The endoscopic preperitoneal approach allows the use of epidural anesthesia, obviating the potential complications and side effects seen with general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of epidural anesthesia for preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Fifty-two patients underwent repair of a total of 80 hernias over a 6-month period. Thirty-six patients underwent their repairs with the use of epidural anesthesia with the goal of a T-4 sensory level. A tension-free prosthetic repair was performed in all patients. Seventeen patients had unilateral repairs and nineteen had bilateral repairs under epidural, while seven patients had unilateral repairs and nine patients had bilateral repairs under general anesthesia. There were no significant differences in patient demographics. All herniorrhaphies were electively performed on an outpatient basis by a single surgeon (A.L.S.) in a teaching setting. There were no significant differences for unilateral and bilateral repairs when type of anesthesia was compared. There was only one conversion from epidural to general anesthesia, secondary to poor sensory blockade first noticed during creation of the preperitoneal space (97% success rate). Seven patients receiving epidural anesthesia experienced pneumoperitoneum during the procedure. This did not effect the ability to perform the hernia repair successfully. There were no complications related to the epidural anesthetic. Endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy can be performed effectively under epidural anesthesia, obviating the need for general anesthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬膜外麻醉用于内镜下腹膜前疝修补术的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
腹腔镜疝修补术因需要全身麻醉而受到批评。内镜下腹膜前入路允许使用硬膜外麻醉,避免了全身麻醉的潜在并发症和副作用。本研究的目的是确定硬膜外麻醉在腹膜前疝修补术中的效果。在6个月的时间里,52名患者接受了总共80个疝气的修复。36例患者使用硬膜外麻醉进行修复,目标是达到T-4感觉水平。所有患者均行无张力义肢修复。硬膜外麻醉下单侧修复17例,双侧修复19例,全麻下单侧修复7例,双侧修复9例。患者人口统计数据无显著差异。所有的疝修补术都是在门诊基础上由一名外科医生(A.L.S.)在教学环境中选择性地进行的。当麻醉类型比较时,单侧和双侧修复无显著差异。只有一次从硬膜外麻醉转为全麻,继发于腹膜前间隙形成时首次发现的感觉阻滞不良(成功率97%)。7例接受硬膜外麻醉的患者在手术过程中出现气腹。这并不影响成功进行疝修补的能力。无硬膜外麻醉相关并发症。内镜下腹膜前疝修补术可以在硬膜外麻醉下有效进行,避免了全身麻醉的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Appendectomy The efficacy of epidural anesthesia for endoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy: a prospective study. Results of a prospective multicenter trial evaluating the ePTFE peritoneal onlay laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty. Laparoscopic treatment of nonparasitic cysts of spleen and liver. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an institutional setup.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1